Normally I don't play these games, but since you insist...
Amnesty international knows the law and since you are so picky you should be aware that of course Israel has also violated the Geneva Convention.
UN resolution Resolution 446: "...‘determines’ that Israeli settlements are a ‘serious obstruction’ to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention"
UN Resolution 471: "...‘expresses deep concern’ at Israel’s failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention"
UN Resolution 607: "...‘calls on’ Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention
By the way, how many UN resolutions have been targeted at Palestine? 1. Israel? 77.
Either you are lying and don't know history or you are deliberately trying to manipulate public perception. Apparently in your view Israel has more rights to the stealing and occupation of Palestine than the natives who had inhabited it for more than a thousand years. That also constitutes violation of natural law, someone with your worldview wouldn't understand.
So apparently even Amnesty recognizes Israel to have borders? No UN resolutions have condemned "Palestine" for terrorism, religious indoctrination of their youth, and the explicit targeting of ISRAELI civilians. Here's your unbiased heads of the UN the same body that voted FOR ISRAEL'S EXISTENCE - POD
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/anger-after-saudi-arabia-chosen-to-head-key-un-human-rights-panel-10509716.html
Current head of the Commission: Zeid bin Ra'ad .. guess where he is from.
Natural LAW?
The spoils of war never belonged to the victor. Asked the natives.
If your indication is that the UN is a sham than I won't dispute that argument. They were founded by the Rockefellers and like you said are directly responsible for the creation of the Zionist supremacy state. This kind of makes my point; Israel didn't even feel the responsibility to abide by what the UN calls international law.
Natural law of course is way more morally binding than any creation of civilization. This is the simplest logic and ethics. If someone was born someplace he has a right to stay there.
Agreed: UN is a sham
Agreed: Rockefeller was bad
Disagree: Zionist Supremacy
ethics?? Ethics really? Well I will say this; I’m so happy I can imprint this onto the blockchain:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1929_Hebron_massacre
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_and_Muslim_countries
I guess everyone can be dirty together!!!
Think about who you are accusing of genocide and ethnic expulsion including the whole inconvenient fact of Israel hosting 2 million Arabs with full and equal rights. Look dude, whatever you are doing, I’m trying to paint a different picture for you. If you refuse to acknowledge that than there’s no longer a discussion.