I'm looking forward to a time when We don't have to "make money" to ALL live richly. Many think that is impossible, but I know We have the tech to do it.
The use of money is a bane to society overall, because it allows the psychopaths to gain power, able to buy things and People to nefarious goals. I want a society free of psychopathic influence.
Sadly, the psychopaths in control (by virtue of money) hide and suppress the tech.
I have written extensively on what money is and how We can remove the practice of accounting for the energy We add into a system. And wish I had the wherewithal to bring it forth. All I can do is show how to do it...
Money vs. Currency (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/money-vs-currency
The Foundational Function of Money (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/the-foundational-function-of-money
Interesting. We would have to revert to simple ways and live in smaller decentralised groups for that. It would take a cataclysmic event too
Why? I think robots doing all the necessary work no One wants to do will allow Us to live as richly as We choose. I think free energy tech will make accounting for Our energy added (the foundational function of money - from trade/barter to electronic bits) pointless.
I think We can choose to live as We wish - from a cave as a hermit to a lavish mansion (which will no longer be a status symbol, and Most will not want that). Like the Amish, or in a yert, or whatever pleases Us.
Even a house in the sky - electrogravitics offers gravity control and energy from the aether.
Electrogravitics: Gravity Control & Energy from the Aether (9 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/electrogravitics-gravity-control-energy:6?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
I haven't read the link yet but I suspect this sort of thing will only be possible in the west with advanced tech and low population. Different story in places like India or Brazil. Also, won't life lose meaning at that point? I find that a lot of the value we give to life is due to the adversity and brevity of it. I'll give your post a read later with a cup of coffee - you might already have addressed those points
No... It will be global as the need to account for Our energy added diminishes to zero.
And when We are teaching that the purpose in life is to find what We love to do that helps the most... I doubt life will become meaningless.
What purpose in life is there when One is living in poverty (like 70% of Humanity) and starving, like a pretty big percentage?
Looking forward to Your thoughts!