A sensational new fact has come to light after Las Vegas police have released footage of the storming of Stephen Paddock's room. There were no windows broken, though the official statement said Paddock had smashed the windows in his room and shot them out to the concertgoers at Route 91 Harvest Music Festival. How do you want to explain this discrepancy now? Were the windows smashed afterwards?
Photographs of policeman-worn cameras on the night of the October 1, 2017 massacre show that there were no broken windows or curtains blowing in the wind in Stephen Paddock's 32-story hotel suite suite in Mandalay Bay, which contradicts the official narrative.
"We do not have a broken window," says one of the policemen named Cory after entering room 32-135.
"Standby, we opened curtains on a window that is not broken," says another voice in the video as the officers pull back the curtains.
"It's not, it's not, it's not [broken] - Corey is not," a police officer observes.
In addition, another policeman makes a rather strange statement, indicating that the shooter has just set something up by the window.
"There's another [gun] here by the window where he was right now," he said, as though no shooting had taken place from the room, which was perhaps just a sort of command center to coordinate the attack.
Policemen also state that 13 "long guns" were found in the room.
That is, what has been told to us by the official side and the media, Stephen Paddock was the single offender, can not possibly vote. He could not have been shot from his room if the windows were still whole after the storming.
Even in the presentation, Paddock had committed suicide, which is lazy. Because if Paddock had really killed himself, as Sheriff Lombardo claims, why would he have shot himself first in the chest and then in the mouth? It just does not make sense.
If he wanted to put an end to his life, he would have shot only once, and the shot would have gone in the head, as suicides always do.
After a shot in the chest, how could he have had enough strength to shoot himself in the head? Or did he first shoot himself in the head and then in the chest, which would be even more absurd?
It sounds almost like using the typical professional "double-tap method" - one in the chest and then one in the head to liquidate it.
This could mean the murder of a scapegoat and the real culprits were completely different people who shot from a different place.
In any case, prove these recordings and the statements of the police in it, the official representation is a lie!
There are analyzes of the flight movement that night said three helicopters were near the Mandalay Bay Hotel and hovered there for a long time.
In fact, the helicopters hovered just over a portion of the Mandalay Bay rooftop just west of the Event Center Bar for a few minutes (9:48 to 21:50) before all three machine transponders were shut down at 9:50 pm, just 10 minutes before the start of the shooting.
These machines may have dropped snipers on the roof of the convention center, which then went over the roofs to where they shot at the spectators.
This explanation would coincide with the testimony of many witnesses and also with the sound recordings, there were several shooters from different directions.
So it was a planned False Flag and Paddock was the designated Scapegoat, silenced as always in such staged operations.