You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Salvadorian Mother Deported, Forced To Abandon Family

in #latino7 years ago

The job of the police is to enforce codes and statutes, not to protect and serve.

'Protect and serve' is propaganda and mythology.

DIsagree? Too bad, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that police have no duty to serve and protect and that their duty is to enforce codes and statutes.

Sort:  

Wow, you really like distorting the truth, huh? The Supreme Court ruling you reference ruled that "Police did not have a "Constitutional Duty" to protect a person from harm...," especially if it puts them in harm's way, but most of the police that I have known personally in my lifetime have always gone above and beyond. So get over your propaganda!

It doesn't matter what some guys you know have or have not done. The fact of the matter is that SCOTUS has 'made law' that police have no duty to protect a person from harm, only to enforce codes and statutes.

Yet they humanely do so every day! I don't give a hoot what the SCOTUS thinks or how they rule. The liberal SCOTUS has compounded many of the problems this country currently faces. They have become too "political." As far as law enforcement goes, there may be a few bad apples, but overall give 'em a break, will ya.

  1. "Yet they humanely do so every day!" Utterly irrelevant to the topic.

  2. " I don't give a hoot what the SCOTUS thinks or how they rule. " You don't? Yet you argue that the US is a rule of law country. You don't respect the lawmakers' rule and law?

  3. No, I will not give any of the criminals that ran the Chicago black site a break. Nor will I give a break to the silence from LEO nationwide who refuse to go 'ya know, that's pretty bad, and those officers and administrators should all lose their job and be criminally prosecuted.

Unfortunately, the SOCUS has turned to political extremism with their ideologies, and as a consequence, court opinions have become increasingly different in their content from opinions issued by lower federal courts. The SCOTUS has been corrupted, so no, I do not respect some decisions. Will I follow the rule of law, absolutely! To do otherwise would make one a radical anarchist, probably similar to yourself.

'rule of law has been corrupted'

'following corrupted rule of law is good and the alternative is radical anarchism'.

LOL.

Ok.