Can you repeat all of that in laymen's terms? And then give an example? I saw in several places you used legalese to explain the legalese prior. I couldn't follow you very well after I barely got through the first paragraph.
Example: Why is something unimportant or less important considered "repugnant"? See how that comes across to someone who doesn't understand?
I would like to understand. I support education about our legal system, but the laymen has to be able to read and understand it first.
I understand, this text is for people who want to come to Poland. Sorry, I did not inform you about it. I'm just learning what and how steemit
Below almost always mean the Judge in a case has determined fraud. Once a fraud always a fraud. Nunc pro tunc, which just corrects an earlier ruling, that you owe before the case is even heard. Guilt is automatic. It is water law. lol
"The decision annulling the contract entails the consequence that it becomes invalid from the beginning."
Polish law :)
Most land law has been flooded and is actually using Admiralty courts or water law these day's. Atourney's and Lawyers are not shown this and must look to history to find the truth. None of the laws of today are new or innovative and what we are using now comes from ancient Roman commerce.
I have not studied polish law and so most likely I am wrong about it. However I up voted you and followed you to see what you have going. So in the future if you could site sources or provide a link I would appreciate it. I am after all weird and like to see for myself.
Nice post by the way.