Why create and use the word "archation"? Why not just say "aggression"?
Because aggression is part of it, but not the whole of it. There is also theft or other violations of property.
Archation is anything you don't have a right to do. Anything that someone looking to rule you might feel entitled to do to you.
As you can see, aggression doesn't cover it all.
Some people have tried to tell me that theft is aggression. I don't believe it is, partly because others have argued against this, and I see their point. You can steal without resorting to physical force, which is what aggression is to me. You can defraud. You can peacefully trespass. Those are violations of property rights, but not very "aggressive" ones. You still have no right to do them. It is still archation.
Many people try to justify government by saying it isn't aggression because you could leave, or they'll resort to the silly "consent of the governed" thing. I guess I am not governed because I don't consent. Right? I might be murdered for my rejection of being governed, but I am not governed. I might do some things that those who govern-- those who archate-- want me to do. But that's not being governed. If I hand over some money to a mugger because I have weighed the costs of complying or not complying and found compliance to be the smart choice this time, then he has archated. If I choose to comply with a particular "law" because I have weighed the options and decided that complying is the smarter choice in this moment, I have been archated against.
You have no right to initiate force or violate property rights. You have no right to govern, murder, rob, rape, trespass, defraud, or kidnap. Those acts are all the same, ethically. You have no right to archate.
.
Thank you for helping support KentforLiberty.com.
Donations and subscriptions are always appreciated!
If only people understood reciprocity and universality, and applied these concepts to every proclaimed "right" of the State.
Violence is an aggressive practice that employs force and coercion for the purpose of destroying and damaging all categories, and against all persons, entities and areas. Returning to the psychological foundations of behavior aggression and violence, it turns out that human behavior is governed by two of the motives that we direct specifically in order to satisfy a specific need or achieve a goal dictated:
• The primary motivations for survival include self-preservation motives, physiological motivations associated with physical needs, and gender-based motivational motives of sex and motherhood.
• Secondary motivations are acquired through the process of socialization of the individual through learning and knowledge, including the motives of being and the motives of ownership, control and assembly
Great Article Which Was Publishrd From Your Heart.
"No human being has the right, under ANY circumstances, to archate, nor to advocate or delegate archation." This is based on the Zero Aggression Principle, which states: "No human being has the right, under ANY circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, nor to advocate or delegate its initiation.".
@dullhawk
There are many ways to coerce. Some are violent and some are non-violent.
Good one
It's just one thing can make you take wise decision and other can totally devistrate your condition ...... Really @dullhawk I surely like your contents and philosophy