AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM
@JackMedia7
·
Sep 3
The way we do this is by cutting the beam at an angle.
I started looking at the molten metal. All three buildings, both towers in the rubble in the basement areas, and Building Seven. There's these pools of molten metal.
The molten steel was found three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed, he said that molten steel was also found underneath World Trade Center Seven.
So I'm looking through the official reports. What do they say about the molten metal? They say nothing. Wait a minute. This is important evidence.
So where'd that come from? Thermite is so hot; it'll just cut through steel, through structural steel, for example, like a knife through butter.
The products are molten iron and aluminum oxide, which goes off primarily as a dust.
You know those enormous dust clouds. You can imagine when you assemble these chemicals on a large scale.
MORE 9/11 TRUTH AT THE WORLD'S CONNECTION TO UNSTOPPABLE TRUTH AT 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT
CLECK BELOW
The way we do this is by cutting the beam at an angle.
— AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM (@JackMedia7) September 3, 2026
I started looking at the molten metal. All three buildings, both towers in the rubble in the basement areas, and Building Seven. There's these pools of molten metal.
The molten steel was found three, four, and five weeks… pic.twitter.com/QIwXtmvkIp
Check out video below of steel melting on South tower/
彼らはジェット燃料とオフィス用紙だと言いました。
— とき(fundos) (@uchiryu) September 10, 2026
それからこれが鉄骨ビルから流れ出ました。
紙はそんなことしません。カーペットはそんなことしません。「構造火災」は高層ビルを溶鉱炉に変えてから、カメラの前で丁寧に溶けたものを窓から漏らすようなことはしません。… https://t.co/apMHFUoZbA
Plane bounced off Empire State building / No Evidence of a plane sticking out of World Trade Center / Because there were no planes / Just Explosives set from inside //
More video evidence
September 11th….
— Mel Gibson (@MelGibsonstory) September 10, 2026
Never forget what firemen said on that day, and what the Govt and Media have tried to erase…. 9/11 pic.twitter.com/ldrT2kDcAO
This nonsense has already been proven false. Propagating it shows a lack of seriousness that is hard to credit.
A basic check of people alive and watching discredits the ‘no planes’ involved part, as does the well attested to plane parts pulled from the rubble.
As for the observer who though it was like charges going of, it would be. As the steel frame curtain-walls of the Twin towers deformed due to the heat they collapsed. What do you think a whole chunk of building suddenly collapsing 12 feet is going to sound like? And the succession of them is a natural part of that process. Floor after floor slamming into the one below, the sound moving outwards as a explosive clap because when you slam to surfaces together that’s the kind of sound you get.
My wife's cousin worked on the lower floors of one of the towers and saw the whole thing. Still has nightmares to this day.
Try to watch this will an open mind
I watched - more than watched i went and read the article he co-authored in 2016 On The Physics Of High-Rise Building Collapses.
He points to things and makes an non-sensical assumption about pre-installed explosives whithout pondering alternative causes.
The twin towers were full of aluminium and then each recieved a boeing with 30 tonnes of aluminum into them. The melting aluminium from the planes flowing down and meeting the water from sprinklers resulted in explosive reaction, not the prepositioning of thermite.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350630713002604
https://theconversation.com/9-11-conspiracy-theories-debunked-20-years-later-engineering-experts-explain-how-the-twin-towers-collapsed-167353
When people make extra-ordinary claims they need to bring extra-ordinary proof. Steven Jones brought speculation, and continued to do so after more logical explanations answered the questions he had (the first article I link is a year or two before the one he co-authored).
So, to be clear:
The Twin Towers WERE hit by planes as observed by many, many people, and born out by plane wreckage in the rubble;
The fires they created (from the 9k+ gallons of jet fuel on board each plane) melted aluminium the planes were constructed with and that used in the building. The melting aluminium flowed downwards and reacted with water from sprinklers on lower levels which caused explosive reactions as observed. The impact weakened some steel supports, placing their load on others. The concentrated heat of the fires weakened these supports to the point they bowed and the weight of the buildings above finally overcame the structural integrity.
That the tower hit second, but lower, collapsed first bears this out as the weight above the damaged zone was greater than in the first tower and, in similar constructions, where both are damaged, you would expect the one damaged lower down to succumb first.
Being open-minded is great. But allowing anyone to wander in and fill the space with demonstrably false information is foolish. As the bible proverb says, 'The naive person believes every word, But the shrewd one ponders each step.' (Proverbs 14:15)
Guess you have it all figured out! You must have a higher degree in engineering then those that say a fire cannot bring done a steel building. You must know how the towers were built? Inner steel core / Outer steel skeleton. Inner core could only fall straight down by controlled detonatiom.
I gave you a scientific article discussing it. You gave a conspiracy which is disproven by the scientific consensus arrived at by engineers and material scientists.
The US govt has been involved in some truly heinous acts against its own populace, but there is zero evidence that using mainly Saudi suicide bombers to crash into the twin towers so that pre-installed thermite explosives could be detonated is one of these.
That Steven Jones et al don’t like the answers to the questions they posited does not mean there is a conspiracy.
Having read theories, reports, studies, and the like for a quarter of a century, I am comfortable that the towers fell in the way and for the reasons given in the link I gave.
I’m not so convinced that US intelligence services were as blindsided by the co-ordinated attacks and there is at least some credible argument that attacks were expected and allowed to proceed due to a catastrophic lack of appreciation for the planned scale.
Of the two conspiracy theories, mine at least is credible
Quite a thought-provoking post, brother. Thanks for sharing different perspectives
Since Kennedy assassination and Warren commission BS I can't believe any gov't stories //
True, it's really hard to trust them anymore. 😊
!BBH
!HBIT
!UNI