love — Hive

Whether there would be any such thing as true love if all men are assumed to be so rich and handsome?

Whether there would be any such thing as true love if all ladies are relatively beautiful or attractive?
.
The subject of love has a multiplicity of meaning to different individuals. This affect people's choice of who do love and at what point to love. Basically an average teenage girl or boy may perceive love by mere physical attraction. Others can as well liken love to the pleasure we receive while being in close contact with an individual. The truth is that different principles guide the forces of attraction and constitute to what may later be understood as love. Hence the popular saying that birds of the same feathers flock together (Plumas avium euisdem verbum audituri confluerent). But an underlying questions which still seems to be unanswered are, if every extreme feeling of physical attraction can be referred to as love?? Shouldn't the motive for having such feelings influence ones definition of true love?
The answers to this question is mostly revealed by the impression built by certain deceptions inherent in our present day reality. Physical attraction may not therefore necessitate love since in most cases, the character of the individual being loved may not be given due consideration. A girls beauty may be strong enough to build that fantasy called love but her character may reveal a very sharp and unpleasant contrast. A guy's richness is most capable of blindfolding his inherent attitude. The lady tends to see more from the peripheral than the substantial. This is never love at all.
Pleasure is another deceptive device. Young girls/boys may seek pleasure and company from some other person(s), this may not be a revelation of true love since such pleasures can be based on illicit affairs such as sex. So therefore love is far from mere beauty or richness but character and distinction