In the modern world there is a distinction between personal wealth and company wealth. Because the reasons you gave above the company is hardly taxed. This gives rise to the problem who determines if a company is doing good for society and thus gets a great tax reduction.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
My starting point is the question: what affects human life in a positive way?
Are those the innovations (IT, tech)?
Health services?
Science, sport, music, creativity in general?
The second question is what products/ services/ "sources of happiness" I can buy with the money and who will provide me those objects of desire?
And the answer seems to be that are are only a handful of individuals capable to provide me that.
Yes, I can get a great kebab from an average man. And it would be really cool to buy free kebabs for the whole town.
But I want some crazy camera instead. And I would be glad to pay 1000 kebabs for it.
And I would be glad to pay 100.000 kebabs for a Ferrari.
Those chosen few allowed us to enjoy the product unimaginable only 10 years ago. And to admire them as the heroes, to get the inspiration to succeed.
Keeping that in mind I have no problem with Google/Roche/Ferrari and their top people with crazy salaries.
Then I guess you probably want to buy this -> https://imgur.com/gallery/TptQAQU