It's been about a year since I went down the rabbit hole of reading the works of Joseph J. Fischel.

in #morallast year

image.png

I stand by my criticisms of his writings, and his philosophy.

The reality is that, even though libertarians and leftists do occasionally find moments of agreement, our basic philosophical values tend to diverge too much to form coalitions.

I don't think that I'm off my rocker to say that consent is the baseline libertarian moral value. We believe in staying out of your bedrooms unless you're sticking your dick in someone who doesn't want it. We don't care what consenting adults of sound mind do to be happy. If you wanna get into the issue of voluntary cannibalism, I'm willing to deal with that.

The thing is, I think that I'm realizing that I might have gone too hard on Fischel. I mean, it doesn't say anything positive about the state of academia that a Yale professor can't maintain coherent thoughts. He does manage to say things that are true from time to time. He issued a criticism of a Teen Vogue article that demanded "enthusiastic consent" for any sexual encounter. Yeah, try making that work for four years. The night that my ex-girlfriend woke me up at 2am wanting sex wasn't one where I gave enthusiastic consent, but I still consented. Fischel seems to have made a career arguing against consent as a moral value as loudly as possible, and whisper that consent is still a valid factor whenever he needs to assure readers that he's not a rapist.

Still, the phenomenon of leftist philosophy in academia has become a farce. At least Fischel admits that consent isn't a moral value of the left. It can't be a moral value of the left. Socialism can't operate under a moral system that sees consent as a paramount moral component. Wagging a dildo in front of children's faces isn't justifiable in a system of moral values that puts consent first -- as Fischel argued, it's fine when viewed through the intersectional lens.

Still, at least Fischel is trying to be honest. He actually wrote a book entitled Screw Consent. He's making some effort to be out there in his opposition to consent as a moral value. He's doing that while colleges are putting out consent forms for sexual encounters, while pushing an ideology which ignores consent.

Sort:  

Seems like this is a very contentious topic. I have no idea who this is, Fischel is, but he seems to make people upset.

Congratulations @flexbooth! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

You received more than 8000 HP as payout for your posts, comments and curation.
Your next payout target is 9000 HP.
The unit is Hive Power equivalent because post and comment rewards can be split into HP and HBD

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out our last posts:

Our Hive Power Delegations to the February PUM Winners
Feedback from the March Hive Power Up Day
Hive Power Up Month Challenge - February 2023 Winners List
The Hive Gamification Proposal
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!