Most content creators probably aren't investors. We don't know if Tony has big bucks or not, and could afford to do that. The system shouldn't be designed to only benefit investors, but to benefit whoever is bringing value. Anthony had the potential of bringing more value than almost any investor, and that potential was almost completely ignored.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Eh. I would argue he has big bucks. Unless he overleveraged somehow and lost a couple mil... and somehow has enough debt to negate his current income... which seems like an unbelievably farfetched premise.
He's probably getting money from Sony or something, to shill certain records?
/FF
Yeah. Just the level of Youtube success he has with subscribers/views puts him in the .001%. To be at that level you're making a lot of money.
Of course the dude is making money, glad he tried out dtube, but youtubers at that level, probably still make more from youtube.
But who knows what happens in the future... Youtube seems to demonetize and "shadowban" people left and right, also youtube is a different scene, dtube/steemit is a different crowd, so maybe his gimmick is a bit to transparent for the crowd here, or maybe people here just don't care about music enough, or they just watch him on youtube and don't see the difference, because they are indifferent to the politics of decentralization vs centralization...
/FF