UK: “Equal Treatment Guide” Tells Judges to Treat White Defendants Worse Than Colored Ones

Here’s the thing, goyim.

Equality is good. Equality is fair. Equality means that everyone is equal in status, rights and opportunities.

But if a group of people (e.g. Moslems) lose their equalness due to the Crusades or Adolf Hitler, then they need to be made more equal to other groups (e.g. whites) to rebalance the scales.

It’s just basic Jewish math.

Breitbart:

Official new guidance on “equal treatment” instructs judges to favour non-white defendants in order to “redress inequality”, despite recent research having found young white men to be the most derided group in Britain.
Produced by the Judicial College, the organisation responsible for training judges in Britain, the Equal Treatment Guide’s latest edition says: “True equal treatment may not … always mean treating everyone in the same way.”

Quoting former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Blackmun, the equality guidance, which was first produced in 1999 under Tony Blair’s Labour government, states: “In order to get beyond racism, we must first take account of race.

“There is no other way. And in order to treat some persons equally, we must treat them differently.”

Despite official government policy issued in 2016 outlining a raft of measures authorities, including police and schools, must take with the goal of maximising the number of hate crime reports, the Equal Treatment Guide repeatedly refers to reported “rises in hate crime” against certain groups as explanation to why judges should treat some people more favourably than others.

“The psychological impact of hate crime on the Muslim community has been severe,” judges are told to take into account, in a section on “Islamophobia” which cites the Islamic fundamentalist-linked Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), a Muslim supremacist umbrella group.

“In key areas of life such as education, health, housing and employment, there is evidence of significant disadvantage experienced by certain minority ethnic groups”, states the guidance, which says research has found “strongly negative attitudes amongst the white population towards immigrants, refugees, Muslims, Gypsies and Travellers”.

Such intolerance “makes it difficult to be a Muslim in Britain”, according to the document, which exemplifies this with the statistic that 41 per cent of UK citizens agreed with the statement “Islam is an intolerant religion” in a 2015 poll.

To be fair, it is difficult being a Moslem in Britain. Yes, you’re prioritized for the best housing in the country, get fantastic benefits for doing nothing and can even become the mayor of London without adequate qualifications.

BUT (and this is a big “but”)…

Whites are often mean to you. When you bomb civilians in the streets of major cities, the locals mutter unflattering words about you in the pub. When you abduct white schoolgirls and transform them into kebab meat, some whites – not all, but some – will click “disapprove” rather than “approve” when the BBC publishes an online poll about it.

It just creates an unwelcoming atmosphere.

Unwelcoming and uncongenial.

For this reason, goyim, I fully support the United Kingdom’s decision to create a judicial environment in which Moslems don’t get punished for anything, while white teenagers go to prison for 25 years for pirating Anchorman 2.

After all, if complete racial integration is the end goal of these changes to society, and I ensure you…

pauses to rub hands

… it is, then we first need to bridge the gap between white privilege and non-white underprivilege.

Who, other than a White Supremacist, could disagree with such logic?