Demanding payment in a very traceable cryptocurrency is a foolish move. Litigation regarding prevention is one thing, I'm more interested in this info putting some of the conspiracy theories to rest.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Demanding payment in a very traceable cryptocurrency is a foolish move. Litigation regarding prevention is one thing, I'm more interested in this info putting some of the conspiracy theories to rest.
There are still options to randomize bitcoin transactions thru "Bitcoin'Mixer" or you use other anonymity coins like Monero or PIVX to delute the trace.
Maybe its also there intention to falsely point to one Bitcoin address who knows...they are probably smarter than us :-)
Thats what i wanted to say. As long as they dont make a move towards KYC exchanges from that address or other transparent blockchains they are fine...all they need to do is to delute the tracks before they do so trough an anonymous coin like Monero
It may aslo be their economic move...who knows anyway:)
anonymization of bitcoin is not something i have looked much into - yes, i'm sure they have some options i don't know about!
Gambling sites, just like Paddock used casinos.
but if the FBI gets access to the gambling site's servers - which they probably already do - then there is nowhere to hide in there.
This is why I believe this is a psyop. State actors will effectively preclude any possibility of laundering any proceeds of extortion by use of their panoptic surveillance, and 733t H4x0rs know that. Given that they're releasing some of it for a couple hundred BTC, they are spending practically nothing on security, which makes such paltry sums really poor motivation to extort terrorists that have the demonstrated abilities the 911 perps do.
Edit: this is also why Paddock had to be connected to the Feebs. High Rollers are high vis signals in the noise, and Paddock laundering millions through the casinos made him glow.
I suspect the documents are more likely to confirm a variety of conspiracy 'theories' - but we shall see!
Thats what i wanted to say. As long as they dont make a move towards KYC exchanges from that address or other transparent blockchains they are fine...all they need to do is to delute the tracks before they do so trough an anonymous coin like Monero
It may aslo be their economic move...who knows anyway:)