Our most recent video report!
See the original article below:
Josh Sigurdson reports on the absurdity of a recent announcement by the Canadian government that Service Canada employees should no longer assume their customers are a "he" or a "she", to not call them "Mr" or "Mrs" and instead of calling them "mother" or "father", call them "parent 1" or "parent 2" in order to not offend them.
This is just the latest twisted push by the Canadian government in order to weaken and confuse the populace. These are their priorities? Instead of facing the crippling debt Canadians face, or the constant threats the populace faces, the privileged and easily offended want to stop assuming genders?
It comes from the same backwards belief as thinking "Service Canada" is a service when it enforces its will on people and extorts them. Or that taxation is fair because the government says so, but it's not fair to work hard to earn money and not have it stolen.
This is all psychological manipulation as well as a massive distraction mechanism.
A weak populace is a subservient populace and this is why this should be heavily questioned. Of course we should respect others. If they want to be called a man or a woman when they are not scientifically, sure. Not my life, I'll respect that. But when this comes with the stigma of criminalization, then we live in a tyrannical society. Who then is truly privileged?
Stay tuned for more from WAM!
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
I think if one of my kids called me Parent 1 I'd smack them!
This is some crazy stuff. I don't know what's going on in Canada. A Canadian television host named Stephen LeDrew was suspended and then fired for committing the sin of appearing on Tucker Carlson's show to discuss LGBT issues. In addition, Professor Jordan Peterson of the University of Toronto is getting all kinds of grief just because he stands up for the right to free speech.
There are some truly wicked people out in this world that should not be in power.
Sadly, that is common throughout much of the world.
What if parent 1 wants to become parent 2 but since there is no third option they just get offended?
What if I want to be parent b and dont identify with numerology? This is going way to far. Can we just decentralize public services already so we can have people know the public they are assisting? So this dissociation from our citizens doesnt try to turn humans into helpbots?
Good news ,I am very interesting.
Well this is going to make being from the South difficult, lol (obviously US, but just speaking as if this were more a social policy than a single government ordinance, I mean, I would like to know as a respectful human how to address these gender revolutionists). Even my friends notice how often I use Sir and Ma'am. If a gender fluid individual is striving so hard to be one or the other (or I suppose potentially neither), wouldn't it be a respectful thing to address them as you see them, male or female. Now on government documents, it would be more inclusive to do parent one and parent two, then add check boxes or blanks for relationship. The government can't just go and abolish a relationship though. Just poof! But... I did see a video by our buddy over at @pressfortruth discussing the attack on the family, and the implications of child ownership, so this plays right in to that rhetoric. So, in their mind, you aren't the Mother and Father any ways, but we as humans know we were born of some other humans and know them as our Father and Mother. So this just seems ridiculous, but not surprising, per the usual. Also, agree with getting offended by the offended. Sit down, hush, adults are trying to figure out civilizations survival.