The only basis I am aware of for this accusation is Malone stated who it was that attacked his medical license. Given that specific and singular event, I disagree with your implication that doxxing is a tactic Malone often employs.
That's not how it played out in the video I watched him in. He was openly advocating it was time to start fighting back. If I remember correctly his aim was toward the globalist players and said he'd furnish them with these individuals personal information.
Malone constantly 'talks shit' about the jabs, but as you can see from this post he is citing hard data and not talking out his ass.
Not on prime time television he is not. He may talk about the failure of mRNA technology but he is not allowed to bad mouth the jabs. He has spoke out against children being given these jabs. Even Dr McCullough is limited in what he can say about the vaccines. I was surprised to see him on Laura tonight given lead way to try and explain why it's the states with the highest vaccination rates seeing the highest covid cases. He could say the vaccines were waning in their ability to provide protection, something that has already pretty much been established because otherwise people wouldn't need more jabs. It was sort of a double speak conversation given cases are "supposedly not as severe" but that could have been just to save face with "whoever" it is behind the scenes that obviously must be a threat to anyone who outright claims the vaccines are a failure...that is never allowed to be said. So it was wishy washy between is it because it's a milder variant or the vaccines keeping from getting as ill.
Malone basically, as I said in my blog on it, stuck some peanut butter in some chocolate but never perfected it into a perfect peanut butter cup. Go ahead and spend some time going over these patents, yeah it's painstaking time consuming but you said you have some science back ground, see exactly who it was that found that the FE system using certain metal wires didn't cause the cells to explode, see who it was that got nanotubes successfully into the cells, see who it was that got those nanotube the ability to send back information of cellular activity and than you'll see Malone for the liar that he is because that man did not develop this mRNA technology being used or these vaccines.
https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=19&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22%09Lieber%3B+Charles+M%22.INNM.&OS=IN/%22
Here's the thing. Malone is right that from the beginning they couldn't get it to last. That was a long time ago. Maybe he spent years more trying to do that which Liebers succeeded at but he failed. It wasn't just getting "whatever" into the cells to produce a positive result, which it does produce a positive result but it doesn't last, but also that it didn't destruct the cell or the cellular activities breaking through the cellular barrier.
If you go look at the blog I did on it it provides part of Malone's research and a link to it from at the beginning, it also provides a link to his patent, which has long expired. So you look at that than go over Liebers stuff, regardless if Liebers was involved or not you can certainly see the difference between the two so when he got called out on Laura's show for basically being a liar, actually was you are not the creator of the vaccines or technology, to which Malone said he begged to differ you will clearly conclude that Malone is lying. Than you can come back to me and tell me your conclusion on why someone would lie about such a thing.
I appreciate the perspective on Malone. While Malone's patent has expired, he certainly had that patent, and I find his present actions and perspective a lot more palatable than Lieber's, who was clearly a vile human being and traitor regarding this and other technology.
All that being said, I have too often taken rhetoric at face value, and you have set off my alarms that remained muted after noting he worked with the CIA, and I am going to be prepared now to completely disavow him when he advocates something sketchy.
I was just reading his latest screed, and found I agreed with many of the points he made and principles he espoused, but for one: I do not agree the state has authority over my medical care, and that seems to be his position. I'll keep a weather eye on him now, grateful to you for the head's up.
Thanks!
I didn't say he worked for the CIA though others have made that claim since I first surmised he may be a CIA operative or an informant. It was what he said about being active on social media that led to a CIA officer in Wuhan calling him on January 6, 2020 and that call was the first time he witnessed what mass formation psychosis was. I call bull crap about that one. How really likely is it that a CIA officer in Wuhan is calling you out of the blue showing signs of mass formation psychosis. It's just not believable. Second was the fact he could remember the date of the call off the top of his head. If a stranger called you over two years ago could you remember the exact date. I know I couldn't, maybe the month, the year but the exact day? Highly unlikely. As I was researching him also I found it particularly odd the number of jobs he's had in his life. He's either got a severe case of border line personality disorder, failed miserably at continued attempts to stick RNA into cells without causing damage to the cells, or those jobs are used as cover for CIA field operations. He also isn't the only one listed on his patent but he did not create the technology involved. Sticking RNA into the cells and it lasting four hours isn't a technology. I am not saying anything he is saying is wrong beyond the outright lie he's the creator of the mRNA technology, what I am saying is, in this current environment, can anything or some of things he is saying be trusted. Yes Charles Lieber is an evil man but none the less he is a evil man with a beautifully gifted mind.