What criteria would he have failed? He was a Bernie supporter is that it? If better screening is the answer than why are there kids carrying guns? The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to have a good guy stop him, usually with a gun. If you take guns away from them, then what? Does anyone ever consider that we may need less restrictions to curb these behaviors? Maybe if we had people carrying Ar's and AK's in meetings like that it would go better.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The police took 72 minutes to respond. That's usual and not surprising too. Cops usually hide behind their cars and wait for SWAT. SWAT waits until they have the advantage. While all that waiting is going on, people are dying. People, therefore, should not depend on government agents to protect them. History proves doing so is a very bad idea. One of their mottos is wanting to go home safely at the end of their shift after all.
I prefer WE have guns before Police do. I can't stand the logic that Americans should not have arms, but then those that argue that say Police should have guns. We are a heavily armed nation, there is no way to put it back in the genie bottle. I honestly believe if we had more LIBERAL guns laws (as in less restrictive) this would have ended quicker.
I don't understand why it took almost two hours to knock his door down. By that time he was supposedly already dead too. They didn't go in until it was safe for them in other words.
I wouldn't be surprised to see this mentioned when armed drones are mentioned in the future.
We need them for our security. har har