In fact, what you are pointing out is that the science never said safe or effective, and what the science actually says is the opposite: unsafe and ineffective. What is said by science is the data provided by objective inquiry. Safe and effective were bullshit, not science.
As humanity eventually resolved the question regarding the orbits of the planets and today holds Galileo in high regard because of his effort to communicate the data that science actually said, and doesn't remember the names of the inquisitors that censored Galileo, we will eventually resolve these present questions the same way. The delay in resolution will be measured in lost lives.
The sooner we call bullshit on the bullshitters, the fewer of us will die from that bullshit.
Thanks!
The idea of "games" for social modifications became popular in the 60's and 70's. Simon says is a perfect example.
We've been taught since youth to appeal to authority for what is. That's why news channels have "traffic authority" or "weather authority" and of course "health authorities". But have these "authorities" earned the right to determine what is by their skill, or talent, or proven results? Not really. They determine what is by their authority, given to them by higher authorities (the ones with armies) and anyone who questions them is questioning their authority.
But this is too obvious. People can always be questioned. Society needs some sort of unquestionable authority. Enter Science (so called). Instead of "Simon Says" it's "Science says". And if you do ask unauthorized questions, they will say "You can't question the science, you science denier."
That absolutely is exactly the situation. Well said.
Thanks!
Its all the laws of opposites in mirror world lol - fact is, the very pictures and video of them flying in gigantic jets - really is classic clown world - any normal person, if they were not asleep, would realise that - but instead they parrot their talking points -
Thanks!