Your 30 votes to my three hundred is the same as your one vote to my ten.
As I have explained in the article, while it seems like this at first glance, that's not true. With 1 for 1 voting rule, recent attack by exchanges would not succeed in changing all 20 witnesses.
Well, I poke a lot of smot, and my math ain't as sharp as it was before, I took my argument on authority, perhaps @smooth would have time to enlighten us.