Realistic attitude does not mean that we accept reality just like that. We study the situation with its realists so that we can adjust to the demands of the basic principles. In other words, a realistic attitude must coincide with a critical attitude. Moral responsibility requires that we continually improve what is there to be fairer, more in line with human dignity, and so that people can be happier. Basic moral principles are the critical norms we place on the situation. Critical attitude also needs to be of all kinds of power, power and authority in society. We are not submissive, we can not and should not surrender our responsibility to them. The use of any authority must be in accordance with justice and aim to create conditions so that more people can be happier. Never human dignity can be sacrificed. Beyond that purpose their authority ceased. Similarly, all kinds of traditional moral rules need to be critically filtered out. The rules have been aimed at ensuring justice and directing people's lives to happiness. But does it still work that way or has it become a tool to defend circumstances that are just unjust and even bring suffering ?.
Real moral responsibility demands realistic and critical attitudes. The guidelines are to guarantee justice and create a state of society that opens up greater possibilities of members to build a life that is freer from suffering and happier. In reality these attitudes are indeed very difficult to implement but with a unanimous determination and a firm belief. And in a way we always train ourselves to always practice and maintain those attitudes. So with the passage of time these attitudes will be easy to apply by itself. And thus we will surely become a personal person who has solid ethics and morals.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Morality can indeed be unanimously lived by and create a freer way of life from suffering.