You are viewing a single comment's thread from:RE: The Power of the Time Machine: Would changing history be the best use?View the full contextView the direct parentgikitiki (62)in #philosophy • 8 years ago That's what you think ... and what you used to think ... :-).
No. What I think would be a hypothesis.
It must be tested, repeatable, etc to become a theory.
Even theories can be challenged.
Until that is present it is a hypothesis and has nothing to do with what you or I think.
That's how the scientific method works. You don't just get to skip all the intermediary steps and state something is a theory.
I was making a Back to the Future joke.
Heh. I saw hints that you might be trying to joke, but I wasn't completely sure. It's sometimes easy to miss that stuff in writing. Sorry. :)