Sort:  

What aspects are you talking of?

Morality comes from outside.

So morality isn't shaped by hundreds of years of evolution?

That's a tough question, I'm still grappling with it.

Evolution is the source of ultimate truth - which means for me that truth can be defined as whatever survived the process of evolution and the oldest something is the more truth it conveys.

Thus I treat evolution as a mechanism of discovering the truth. Morality manifests itself via evolution but is not the end-product of it.

We could say that morality is the set of rules that allowed those who followed them to survive. But this does not imply that evolution created those rules. Instead we could say that evolution revealed the rules we now call morality.

Actually I was thinking about an answer against the "evolution created those rules" argument but couldn't find any. It seems logical that nature had those rules already and by time it just revealed them to us, because we were getting smarter to discover them. So morality does come from something outside. But why do you think there is another reality outside of this one?

But why do you think there is another reality outside of this one?

Because I don't know of anything that does not have some sort of reality outside of itself. Both mathematically and physically there is no such entity.

But just because you don't know anything like that, doesn't mean that it exist. Basically we are on the atheist stage of a universe out of ours =D

Yeah, but this also means that atheists believe in something that nobody has ever encountered: a self-contained entity without any external reality. That's a nice paradox: atheists are the most irrational creatures one can imagine - they believe in things that even mathematically don't exist.