Sort:  

Who you are isn't just a no body or a some body...

Agreed. They seem simply different forms of the same thing to me.

Yeah exactly, but what is under that or behind the form, the form that is formless?

...what is under that or behind the form...

If you knew that definitively and could express it in words then you could start a new religion. 😎

You are exactly right. This is part of the point. That if we CAN'T know. Then it shouldn't burden you. It burdens many. Many have an idea that if they knew, somehow everything would be fixed with that knowledge.

Ok we are on the same page at last, @scottcbusiness. 😎

The burden may come from such thoughts due to them leading to question ego itself and my guess is that we all know how ego can be an unmanagable child at times. 🙈🙉🙊

Yeah for sure. To seek truth is to lose what you thought was yourself. Who is it that is still seeking this truth? (something a guru would ask)

I don't think anyone can know anything with absolute certainty, but it's possible to think you know something and say you know something with absolute certainty (i.e. organized religion). But even if we cannot know anything for certain, it's possible to perceive the formless & nameless.

You're right, but it's not about knowing the known. It's about the unknown :) Exploring...
It's more of a feeling than it is a knowable comprehensible thing

The only purpose of the unknown for me is making it known I.e. Acquiring knowledge and wisdom. The stateless state of remaining in the unknown is not something that I am interested in. For some people it makes sense but not for me, at least not right now.

@scottcbusiness

That makes total sense.
For me it's like...
To genuinely seek truth, you must forget everything you knew and rebuild. To genuinely seek truth you must lose who you were before to become who you must be in order to do this. To genuinely seek truth you won't be you and yet it will be the most you that you've ever been.

...it's possible to perceive the formless & nameless.

Totally agree. To try to explain it through our system of subject-object language/barking pretty well always falls short, in my opinion. To the point that it would seem almost impossible to get a handle on except in a experiential way. Some teachers may have that ability so not meaning to rule out verbal teachings entirely.