Here is my interpretation: H is a wick. ka is the life force. Heka, channel the life force. I'm having trouble with you associating H with an eternity symbol. Heka looks more like a conduit, discipline, rules, walls, boundaries symbol to me. ka is just the life force. It is not useful unless it is embodied.
I like your writing and I agree with you on many things. However, I disagree that there is eternal morality. Morality is a construct of humanity. We need morality to live meaningful, productive, peaceful lives. However, we write the rules according to what we value and how the natural forces and human nature will allow us to get what we value. It is unfortunate that recent governments are writing rules that are to to detriment of countries as a whole but the writers of those rules do not live by the values that they think everyone else should live by. For example, take open borders and letting criminals out of jail. A lot of the "rules" that Barack Obama and the Globalist virtue-signallers are writing for us seem good to some because they are promising some sort of "union with the divine" or utopia or heaven on earth for everyone. They assume that criminals will stop being criminals if you let them out of jail. They assume that people will be productive if you just let them roam around. This is not so because we are still animals. Animals form predator-prey relationships. Just like predators die off if you take their food, human predatory behavior like murder, rape, and pedophilia will not go away unless you take away the food by making enforceable rules backed up by social norms (it is impossible for law enforcement to do its job without people adhering to an appropriate social contract).
The writers of the rules do not follow the rules they expect us to follow. They live behind walls with security guards but we are not allowed to live behind walls with security guards or we are racist or have some kind of phobia. They are allowed to do acts that would be criminal for the rest of us and get away with the acts because they have held some kind of political position like the Clintons. They give employment to their friends and family but the rest of us have no job security. Etc. etc. They are able to get away with it because they have undermined morality and ethics and a large chunk of people have let them get away with it.
Perhaps the stupid who let the rule-makers undermine reality need to believe that there is some kind of divine and universal morality so that they will follow the social contract and behave themselves. I'd like to go along with this fallacy for "the good of society". However, it isn't the truth. We have to figure out the rules and we have government to enforce them and protect what we value. Metaphysical forces (including a highest "God") will not do it for us.
Ka is embodied in actions. That's the point. Symbolism of arms, hands. For the 'he'. I went by the symbolism rather than the letter sound used for the wick symbol. Also, 'he' related to 'heh' for 'millions of years' as a way to describe eternity, infinity. It ties in well to me.
I see you altered your original post. I didn't say there was "eternal morality" anywhere...
If there were no beings with higher order consciousness like us to abstract the concept of morality, then it wouldn't be known to be there. But that doesn't mean it's not a part of the process of interacting with other beings capable of feeling physical and psychological pain that we come to recognize.
Other animals demonstrate care, which is part of moral understanding, but they have lower consciousness capacities that limit abstraction of higher order concepts like morality which is a word to describe positive reciprocal interactions between psychological beings.
As such, the morality wasn't invented by us, it was a natural development of interacting with others. If only one psychological being with higher order consciousness to understand morality (human) was present somewhere and there were no other psychological beings (animals) to interact with, they wouldn't be able to necessarily recognize the abstract idea of morality because there would be no interactions possible with other psychological beings (animals) since they are the only one. That doesn't make it eternal though... You assumed I was talking about that.
You've blogged about "Good" and "Evil" before and this post tied in to it. In this post, you say that "Ka is a moral essence" with a "moral potential" that we can develop to become better people.
Good and Evil are useful concepts but they tend to be based on what a person or group values.
Lately we've heard a lot about the values of Freedom and Equality. We've also heard new definitions of those values like Freedom means the Freedom to force your sexual fetishes on others or kill your unborn child. Equality means that everyone must have the same outcomes or someone somewhere is an evil racist. These weren't the intended definitions of the people who wrote our Constitution and yet they have been skewed into this new bizarre self-destructive "morality" based on nihilism or complete ill-regard for human nature and reality itself.
A lot of animal behavior is instinctive. I'm not sure that humans are that different. Our morality in the past was based on survival of groups or tribes. As populations grow and individuals are more able to get along without belonging to groups or tribes, new moralities may be necessary.
It's Mark Passio. He doesn't know any secrets. His ideas about "laws" are wishful thinking. It is the nature of the "other side" to never allow us to pin it down. Just when we think we've got it, it changes.
Order followers are a cult! There are only miracles. Be grateful.