Truth is that linking to a pictures source is not enough. If the creator of the art/photo/article etc. has not given permission to use the content, then you must curate the content.
Curated content is now a growing game online. If anyone curated content, they must add a significant amount of their own content to wrap around the content that has been curated.
This is why there's so much of the same type of content being posted online, 250 or more blog posts containing almost exactly the same content!
By the way, are you still involved in the #hardfork series?
Good to see ya!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I follow the principals, but have not been called upon to contribute.
It's an exciting production, and I am impressed with the personnel involved. I am sure that if they feel I can contribute, they will call upon me.
I'd point out that I inquired of you before even saving your work, despite your open offer of it for use for folks. I have no interest in stealing from creators.
If linking to source isn't sufficient to meet legal obligations for copyright, the entire internet is a crime.
Yes, you did inquire about the images that I offered.
I appreciate that you asked, not many people will.
Linking is ok. Swiping the image first is the illegal part. Lol!