I have only one prime lens, a 50mm f/1.8, which came with the EOS M50, but I haven't used it yet. I prefer the flexibility of my zoom lenses, because it's just easier ;) ... and the 24-105, that came with the EOS R is the sharpest lens I ever had :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The 24-104 is an F4 lens isnt it thats a great lens, and I love the nifty 50s I don’t have one for this camera but it will be my next lens to add to my 28MM and 90MM fixed length lenses, and I have the 28-70 Kit lens,
The 24-105mm is really great and I would never go anywhere without it :)
I think, I should give the nifty fifty a chance - maybe one day I'll take it with me :) I never felt very comfortable with prime lenses.
My next lens for the EOS R will be a wide angle lens like 16-35mm, but it's too expensive for me at the moment. Until then I use the 10-18 from the EOS M50, when I need it.
When out walking and hiking it around the city zoom lenses are so much easier than prime lenses ideally I would love a faster lens in a range similar to your 24-105 and I a wide angle lens I think the Sony one I am looking at is 12-24mm and it may we’ll be my next and last lens unless people go crazy buying prints 😂
That's right. For landscapes, a f/4 lens like the 24-105 is fine, and the faster canon lenses are not affordable anyway.
12mm would be too wide for me - I have not used the 10-18mm much, and if I did, then I shot from 14-18mm I think.
Yes I probably wouldn’t use it down at the 12mm end if it but but from midrange to 25 perhaps
They also have a 15-35 2.8 lens but that’s 600 odd more and hard to justify
Good morning JJ :)
right, prices for good lenses are really extreme, and I couldn't explain to my wife, why I would need a new wide angle, when I already have one, although the newe one would be worlds better ;)
Indeed they are and to non photographers it is hard to explain why one lens is better than another but of course we know