Yeah that's why I gave everyone time to rethink their delegations and what the issue is, even though I would've wanted to go downvote whatever he had voted up in exchange for delegations considering how he had given two 100% downvotes to a user with 5k hp who dared downvote his automatic post updates which I found disgusting. Instead I went and countered his downvotes and downvoted hive.curation's active auto posts (which he also decided to retaliate back on my posts with other people's delegation - such as yours) and I chose to wait it out and give everyone a chance to read for themselves and make their own decision. I'm sure there's better projects out there people can delegate to than one who only does this, especially with an owner who behaves that way.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
My life experience tells me that any dispute can be resolved when there is will from both sides. I hope the same will apply here.
@Hive.curation has offered an unparallel APR of 18%, which is needed to carry on my social projects.
However, I do agree that good for one person cannot be based on harming others. I hope there is a win-win solution here.
I don't really understand how a certain APR is needed, when it at the same time means manual curators and others are the ones getting less APR since we all share the same rewardpool, but that's coming to an end with the next hardfork either way so no point talking about it. But yes, would've been nice if his actions hadn't been dirtier than any words I may use when calling out assholes like that, but I won't be as nice in the future if I see him or any other similar attempts to skew rewards in favor of a few so the main perpetrator can get a bigger cut at the cost of everyone else on the chain.