Why not just worry about if the content meets your standards, I mean in some way or another every curation group including yours is maximizing stake in exchange for some type of rewards/benefits. The technicalities of how is a very thin line.
This is like a bunch of bored control freaks making up rules so they can be enforced.
What is the goal?
Delegation for profit is vote selling.
The pool is every person for themselves, until they start ganging up.
And here we are 5 years later, most of the favored gone, most of those rewards sold at <.2usd, the gangs still boasting how they help the less fortunate, and what do we have to show for it?
A mussed up slate that we can write anything we want on.
That's not all bad.
Yeah, I'm here for the crypto community and the friends I've made.
The politics are a constant source of entertainment.
People in crypto are flocking to where they feel like they are winning, because humans like to feel successful. We seek pleasure and avoid pain.
But a handful of people treat Hive like a castle with a moot and guards..
The results are less users, lower price and content that is subjective.
One can never just make a casual post without fear of being a Milker or whatever.
Well, the nice thing to know is that as long as we don't sit idly by while a certain few accounts cement in their controlling interests because of the falling inflation and math, those that think like that will be diluted out of controlling the coin with time.
Do you think 'the community' is even aware enough to see this take over before it happens?
I want to say 8 years was the tipping point, but I'm not certain.
Discussions of this 'fact in the math' are not making it to trending.
The long term interests of the coin are in having no masters, but you can't really expect somebody to not take candy from babies once they have the taste for it.
It's unnatural.