I doubt anything "works for you" because its clear from the content of your posts that you aren't a successful or knowledgable poker player.
Your incoherent response shows this, as do the numerous conceptual errors in your posts. As do your posts praising Chris Ferguson and FTP.
As to my strategy for not tilting, I don't have one because one isnt necessary. Its not a real issue for me, and its not a real issue for most winning players that I have met.
People who think tilt is a real issue are people like you -- unsuccessful recreational players with very little experience, and a bunch of general knowledge and platitudes they copied out of a beginners poker book.
Maybe one day we all can be as great as you. Till then I'll continue to post original text. Thanks for taking your valuable time to chime-in.
Your content is plagairzed, not original. Hopefulkly, honest users will continue to flag it, as it takes away value from this platform.
funny, i was thinking the same thing, just without the oxy.
And y eah, its bad, plagarized content, because you stole it mostly from out of date beginners books and videos. Youve figured out that if you steal information so general as to be effectively useless to everyone, you can defend yourself from accusations of plagarism by claiming that what youre writing is so common knowledge that everyone knows it.
Just like the n early identical wording between phil gordons book and your post on the rule of 2 and 4. Lame, stolen garbage
This authors content is not good right. It's full of spelling mistakes and grammar errors. It's clear that the whales upvoting the content either aren't actually reading it or don't care about the quality. Whatever the case, we can't really do anything about it because of the actual whale size and I am afraid of getting maliciously downvoted. Something I am afraid of with this guy's posts is that down the line there could be a situation similar to patent trolling. This person could write enough articles to 'cover ' most of the concepts. Then if anyone new comes in and tries to write better articles on the same topics, the whales will come along and downvote due to 'plagiarising'. If it's the case that the whales are planning this kind of thing then I'm sure this plan would be being worked on all over the platform. I do not think very highly of complexring, kushed or steemed. They seem like absolute scumbags who will twist public opinion in their favour to make more money.
So it's bad, plagiarized content...hummmm, sounds like an oxymoron.
The initial content could be bad already, I don't quite understand how it could be an oxymoron.