If a muslim carries out an attack, ( unknowingly handled/set up , by mossad), but he thinks he is doing it for some 'jihad', or other...
...would this be an islamic terrorist attack, or a mossad/zionist attack..?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
He should be called a useful idiot who unknowingly helped the MOSSAD.
It would still classify as an MOSSAD/Zionist attack.
So by that argument, the person who pulls the trigger is not guilty from his own motivations?
IF he believes he is doing it in the name of islam, it is not an islamic attack?
If other muslims take inspiration from it, and also do an attack - it would be a successful Zionist psi op?
..it would still be down to the zionist plot..?
You see the danger of the logic used in your argument..?
Anybody can absolve themselves of personal responsibility for their actions ...and blame someone else...
Islamic/Christian/Sikh terrorist acts would only start to actually exist once groups like Hagana and people like the Rothschild Banking Dynasty no longer exist.
We currently live in a time where most if not all alleged Muslim,Sikh and Christian "terror" attacks are done by intelligence agencies.
When intelligence agencies no longer exist, only then would any attack by some Ultra religious nutcase be considered a flaw of his/her religion.
So your logic will always go back to rothchilds zionism then, no matter what...?
Look, I am not ignoring Islamic extremism/Christian fanatics.
There are rapes happening in Churches,Mosques and Synagogues by Priests,Imams and rabbis and you have every right to be angry about it but you have to understand that most of them are controlled far more dangerous and far more psychopathic individuals with billions of dollars at their disposal which we should worry about first.
Rothschild Zionism is the fuel and the engine behind the worst of the worst in every religion.
Israel financed not only "Islamic Terrorism" but also Sikh Terrorism and many many other forms of terrorism.
...being controlled is a voluntary action - no matter the deception involved.....
.... far more dangerous and far more psychopathic individuals with billions of dollars at their disposal which we should worry about first.
chipping at base of activists working for them thorug education (and force) is a far better strategy than a few ants attacking an elephant..
Cutting the head of the hydra is all very ideological neat and nice (and preferable), but that doesn't mean it works...
Historically speaking, the head collapses under lack of support, from underneath - not attempting to chop the head off directly..
(...as in boots on the ground fighting extremist ideology - whoever incites it - Collapsing the central banks is a different theatre of war..)