You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Poll: Enhancing the "Mute" Feature

in #poll • 5 years ago

It would require a small amount of extra coding, but you could implement this as follows:

  1. a user setting for posters that specifies whether the user wants this muting to potentially take place on his posts.
  2. a user setting for readers that specifies whether the reader wants to honor this mute setting on posts he reads.

Then default the user setting to honoring the mute setting on posts he reads (and probably default the poster setting to do the muting on his posts).

5 years ago in #poll by
$0.56
  • Past Payouts $0.56
  • - Author $0.52
  • - Curators $0.05
8 votes
Reply 2
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     5 years ago  

    That's a very valid point. And it works mostly this way on https://steempeak.com :D

    Selection_089.png

    $0.42
    • Past Payouts $0.42
    • - Author $0.32
    • - Curators $0.10
    1 vote
    Reply
    [-]
     5 years ago (edited) 

    That's an excellent Idea. but the first should not be there. a user shouldn't have setting for posters that specifies whether the user wants this muting to potentially take place on his posts. It should be readers or curators decide are the comments are abusive or spamming. the second point is excellent and even it can modified as

    give muting option to readers not content creators.

    But still people create bots to mute the comments on their posts :(