Elon Musk's Twitter Isn't As Free As We Hoped

Since Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, there have been improvements in certain aspects of free speech online. However, concerns have arisen as Musk steps down and appoints a CEO who seemingly does not prioritize free speech. Consequently, it appears that little has changed on the platform. This prompts us to question the continued reliance on centralized social networks, particularly when decentralized alternatives like blockchains exist.

While under Musk’s ownership, Twitter made efforts to address some issues related to free speech. However, these policies were not without controversy and raised concerns about potential censorship and infringement on users’ freedom of expression after he left.

With Musk’s departure and the appointment of a CEO with a different stance on free speech, it is certain how the platform will evolve in this regard. Likely, censorship will expand on the platform in ways we did not expect. This highlights the need for alternative platforms that promote decentralization, such as those built on blockchains. Blockchains offer immutable records and decentralized governance, providing an environment conducive to free speech and limiting the control of any one entity.

As discussions around online free speech intensify, it becomes increasingly important to explore decentralized alternatives rather than solely relying on centralized social networks. The landscape is evolving, and users should prioritize platforms that truly embrace and safeguard freedom of expression.