How is assassinating people over political disagreements progress? How is this in any way connected to school shootings?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How is assassinating people over political disagreements progress? How is this in any way connected to school shootings?
I didn't say it was progress, or that it was connected to schools shootings, I said that I personally consider them to be a step up. We could say more justified, if you prefer. It is however taking all the media attention away from a school shooting that also happened, and I think that the school shooting victims are far more deserving of our attention.
I don't condone political violence, but I do think that people who make a living from stoking controversy should understand that people are likely to react violently. Charlie Kirk knew that every day, he put himself and his family in danger, and he decided that it was an acceptable trade off for fame and influence. All public figures must make this choice.
Nothing you said makes no sense. There is a massive gulf between saying controversial or even deliberately offensive things, and shooting people for saying those things. This is victim-blaming, not cause-and-effect. He is no less a victim of senseless violence than the Catholic kids shot in Minnesota.
There is a massive gulf between getting shot because you were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and getting shot because you made your living saying things that deliberately piss people off.
He isn't a victim of senseless violence at all, he was a victim of deliberate violence, likely predicated by his own controversial opinions.
That's a lot like saying a woman was "asking for it" because of what she wears. Controversial opinions and political activism do not justify violence, full stop.
That's quite a leap, since I'm not justifying violence, or saying that Chuck was 'asking for it'. I would love to live in a world where people do not react violently to words, but there is no place on this earth where that world exists. As a comedian, I say a lot of things that piss people off. As a thinker, I understand that means some people are going to try kicking my ass. I didn't say it was justified, I said it was to be expected.
Since you wanted to compare this to rape... you know who gets raped a lot? Prostitutes. It's not right, but they know someone is going to try it. They aren't even pissing half the country off, they're just quietly giving people something they want.
I'm not condoning violence, I'm condemning celebrity worship. People like Charlie Kirk, but without the audience, get murdered for their words all the time. I didn't see an RIP for a single one of them on your timeline.
People with platforms like Charlie Kirk are fueling the division in this country, and they're doing it knowingly, for profit. Forgive me if I don't mourn with you, but I like to look on the bright side of things, and the bright side of this is that it might actually de-escalate some of the tension in the political sphere.
I apologize if there seems to be a lot of vitriol in my replies. That has absolutely nothing to do with you, and everything to do with my fatigue at seeing people from both sides lose their minds over this.