An interesting point about 5G is that there are numerous patents for using RF to affect neurons, individuals, and even claiming directed physical and psychological responses. If entities that have been undertaking such affects are intent on continuing to do so, given their demonstrable capability to entrain extant infrastructure, their ability to influence the individuals and institutions effecting such research, publication of it's results, and determining how it affects regulation will not be neglected.
Thanks!
That's a good point. With research coming at this from two directions, eventually it seems likely to converge.
Personally, after my mom died of brain cancer, I make a habit of using a speaker or wired cable when talking on a cell phone, and not keeping my cell phone on my physical person any more than necessary, but since the signal strength decays according to an inverse-squared law, I don't worry much about the infrastructure itself.