You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Looking at the EDSI model vs Current state of HIVE

in #saturdaysavers7 months ago (edited)

Thanks for tagging! Its funny because it is in fact confirmed that VSC will not replace H-E, they have no current plans to do a contract for making a token. (edit: within their current proposal)

That said, I am working - not only on hive-engine but also some other things that could help bridge or transition. Let's see what happens.

Sort:  

I should perhaps alter my wording and rather than refer to VSC as a replacement refer to it as being a competitor, co-existence is always possible and frankly Hive-engine will never actually go down so long as it's bridges and witnesses are maintained. It's still not perfectly decentralized but hopefully competition will help kick some life into H-E as well. funding permitting ofcourse.

One can hope someone comes along and takes a punt at contributing improvements.

This, to be honest.

But to put pressure, we actually do need to be honest.

they have no current plans to do a contract for making a token.

This is incorrect, so I'd like to clarify. Our immediate goal is not to release standards for token contracts from the get go. Our main concern is launching an HBD-HIVE LP as our top priority after network launch. We will be tackling community tokens in the near future, but not immediately after network launch

Hey - no offense intended - I am all about priorities.

I think its important for all to understand that this is not within your current proposal, and while you would do it - anyone else could and should consider this into their plans. And of course - can write their own smart contract, sharing the load.

And of course - can write their own smart contract, sharing the load.

I totally agree!

Just wanted to clarify that bit is all :)