https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/doctors-for-covid-ethics-symposium-session-1-the-false-pandemic
As soon as I could manage to do it I messaged some friends this morning:
"It appears that my computer was seriously attacked this morning while I was listening to the Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium. Mouse almost disabled. Bookmarks disabled. Now [8:05 AM] all seems normal after I have bypassed bookmarks to access my banking and FB. But a serious warning has been levelled at me!"
My notes on the "Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium" so far:
Dr Micheal Palmer:
The virus does exist. It has been lab constructed. The signs of lab construction could have been removed but weren’t. Perhaps there was a rush to get it out to infect the world. [It so resembles SARS-1 and any coronavirus that as in the case of SARS-1 if it had been intended that the SARS-2 virus be dangerous this intention was defeated by the natural human immune system world-wide because everybody is used to dealing with the common cold]
The chances of this being naturally occurring virus are 1 in trillions. [This is the reason why they do not produce a sample of this virus. Virology ALREADY knows they are guilty of making a bioterrorism weapon]
The Chinese Sinovac vaccine is based on Inactive [‘killed’] SARS-2 virus which would be impossible to do if there were no virus. [The Chinese Sinovac vaccine is a real vaccine! And is therefore safe]
GoF methods Used: What Function was Gained? Contagiousness to humans.
Just after taking the last note I was attacked.
Am I silly to assume that I was attacked? To most people it certainly would seem a fantastic assumption. Surely, most would say, that sort of thing doesn’t exist.
I listened to a series of interviews many years ago of Kay Griggs, widow of an assassin for the CIA who was being stalked and harassed and threatened to keep her mouth shut and as result she decided to at least put her knowledge onto some public record in case the worst happened. She had terrible tales to tell of agents like her late husband being recruited out of military academies by being sexually abused and groomed and mind-destroyed. I realized from what she said that she was saving her life by spilling all these secrets. If you hold secrets that can be hidden by killing you, the only course is to publicize them as far and as fast as you can to remove the motivation to kill you. Perhaps this is a lesson to apply to being "killed" on-line?
There are other tactics to discredit sceptics. Kay Griggs seemed fantastic to me until more had come to my attention concerning secret Intelligence pedophile grooming and torture-based mind control and identity destruction. Had I not learned more to corroborate what she said I would have assumed it was mostly nonsense or fantasy. Now I have realized that making people appear to be crazy can be a very effective tactic.
Nonsense is seeded into sceptic communities to make them seem ridiculous in the eyes of the public. In my opinion this is a standard CIA tactic. Example: photos have been "leaked" which appear to prove that the Moon landings were faked in a studio. Those who believe this should have taken seriously Sun Tsu's dictum in The Art of War, "Do not consume bait offered by the enemy.”
Most people do not consider how easy it is to fake photos, video and audio such as phone calls. In 1999 an article was published in the Washington Post describing the new real-time voice morphing technology that could make an actor’s voice sound like anybody even as they read from a script. There was the explanation of how the cell phone calls supposedly from the doomed airliners on 9/11 were faked. The general public was taken in easily.
In my opinion the most common CIA tactic to discredit sceptics is called "Limited Hangout”, the “leaking" of some truth mixed with lies so sceptics will take the bait and then the "leaked" item will be revealed to have been tainted or faked so that in the eyes of the public not only are the sceptics discredited but the entire issue is made ridiculous and even the bit of truth in the leak is totally hidden in the general ridicule.
Example: Dan Rather was persuaded that George W Bush had gone AWOL for a year from the ANG to avoid being sent to Vietnam. Rather and his station had been given a "leaked" document proving this. Then the document was proven to be a forgery. George W Bush coasted into re-election in 2004 and Kerry who had actually served in the Vietnam War was smeared. But despite the document being a fake, the truth was that Bush really HAD gone AWOL for a year. The limited hangout (or bait and switch) had neatly buried that entire issue forever.