Just pointing out that not one of your 3 questions has ANYTHING to do with the shape of the earth. Does that not strike you as illogical and bizarre when his CLAIM was that there are mountains of evidence that the earth is a sphere and you seem to be trying to refute his claim? Just saying.
That you deny EVERY ONE Of the millions of images is weird. EVen in the article, I show you that you can see the live raw data of the Hinawari, and access the Copernicus raw satellite data. There are even on line tutorials to teach you how to access and use the Copernicus data. It's MUCH MUCH too large, accurate, and much too copious an amount of information to be faked. Perhaps you can simply use some of the data yourself and check it against known events as others have done with their cloud cover and the times and dates of storms. You do realize that, even if you reject EVERY image from NASA, they are not the only space agency in the world, right? Your rejection of this evidence is not evidence of the absence of evidence.
I don't know. I believe they state it many times. I assume you simply do not believe them. That is fine. But what does that have to do with the shape of the earth? Please be specific.
It's not. I've even written an article on this. That you THINK it is, is simply due to your lack of ability to fact check and use logical thinking skills; the main intellectual maladies that causes flat earthers to BE a flat earther. But again, what would that have to do with the shape of the earth? Did you charter a plane or take a boat to Antarctica and have film of you being shot at? If not, then what makes you believe that you COULD NOT do that if you wished? Please read my article below before answering. And please be specific about your claim and support your claims with verifiable evidence.
In summary, in this article discussing the shape of the earth, you asked 3 questions having nothing to do with the shape of the earth in order to try to prove the shape of the earth! Does that not strike you as completely illogical?