Sure @lys , Fake Science: A New Record, Over 100 Peer Reviewed Studies Was Retracted From Cancer Journal
There were previous published fake peer review that I wrote about years earlier, and I had hoped the problems were addressed but this showed that the peer-review process is systemically flawed...
https://ronmamita.wordpress.com/2017/04/26/fake-science-a-new-record-over-100-peer-reviewed-studies-was-retracted-from-cancer-journal/
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Looks interesting! Thanks for the link. I hope to write another article about the issues around scientific publishing and the journal industry. This might give some more ammunition!
Ha-ha, No shortage there it's an industrial ammunition manufacturing plant! LOL 😃
Look into astronomy and see the "Red-shift" star light controversy; once again peer review process was problematic...
Happy hunting - ahem, researching!