Sort:  

I flagged @logic because of his malicious actions and lying about my finding, so this was correctly flagged. While you and logic flagged me maliciously, because there was no reason to flag my findings. They are interesting and other people like them. But as a gesture of good will I can withdraw flagging, if you both do the same first.

"While you and logic flagged me maliciously, because there was no reason to flag my findings"

You flaggedboth my comment above and my recent post so I flagged you back on this post. I have the same right ot flag as you do. You started flagging so got it back.

Keep your flag on my post, I enjoy my flag on yours...

@walden there was no reason to write this comment, btw.

"his malicious actions and lying about my finding"

I have no clue what you are talking about.

  1. copypasta of YT video - check
  2. lack of original content added - check
  3. lack of providing the title of the video - check
  4. lack of stating who is the author of the video - check
Loading...

@logic Why is there no reply buton where is that sentence: "The reward should go the the author of YT video..."?

No, because he has not posted a link to his video here. It is his choice. He will have his reward by having increased viewing of his video, because of the post, which I posted here.
However, I do not care much about rewards, you can make a system rewarding posts with links to other articles with less rewards than the original ones.

@walden Please explain why you flagged all of my postings.

Because he is a flag monkey he loves following others and if you flag one of his people he will just flag you, no reason given just a flag monkey. :)

relax, I will remove them tomorrow

@walden Fine words butter no parsnips

Sorry, the system wont allow me to remove them now

Then why did you want to wait?