Who dies decide nature, not the individuals and that's okay, because every population of biological life has it's ups and downs - thats what i meant.
To restore from a copy isn't that necessary. Like if you recreate mammoth now (there is such a possibility), would it be any better to ecosystem as a whole?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@zaebars
Last I checked we are nature. Nature has decided so long as we have decided.
If I make an active choice to copy my genetic information in order that one day this genetic information will continue on again. Then it doesn't matter what form I store that in, whether it is by having children, by freezing my zygotic cells, preserving my stem cells, or taking the ultimate selfie.
Either way if it works, it will mean that I decided to make it work and because I am as much a part of nature as anything else in the physical universe, it will mean that nature has decided that this is as well.
On a side note, don't anthropomorphize nature, she hates it when you do that. :D
Probably:)
But still, every year humanity consume so much resources, that we are living in debt - so if the growth of population will continue with this speed, future us (in any form) will be not so happy, even if you "take every human on earth right now and give them over 1,000 acres of land " it doesn't help - resources like food and clean water are already quite limited.