Supreme Court Mulls Case Overthrowing Entire Federal Government
Nobody’s talking about it on the mainstream news - yet. On upcoming Jan. 6, 2023, the United States Supreme Court will hold conference considering batches of potential new cases, among them is #22-380, Brunson vs. Alma S. Adams et al. which seeks to overthrow a corrupt White House administration, together with 385 members of Congress.
If four of the nine SCOTUS justices approve, the case will proceed immediately to a full hearing before the Court, who will then have jurisdiction to permanently remove Pres. Biden & Vice President Kamala Harris from public office, along with anyone who voted against investigating the electoral college results at the joint session of Congress following the 2020 election.
The case was brought by four Utah siblings, Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor, formerly known as the Brunson Brothers, who performed during their youth as musical trumpeteers, similar to the Osmond family entertainers. In middle age, Raland Brunson became a Constitutional scholar, whose latest project challenging the 2020 presidential election took two years to reach the Supreme Court.
All matters which fall before the U.S. Supreme Court begin their journey as unlikely long-shots. The brothers, shocked at the blatantly corrupt outcome of the 2020 presidential election, decided to take action through a lawsuit. Their standing is based merely upon voting in the election. Many similar lawsuits failed across the nation, based on “standing,” which begs the question, who exactly DOES have standing to challenge an election, if the Courts deny everyone on procedural grounds?
As a strategy, the Brunsons commenced a bifurcated path to the highest court in the land. Rayland proceeded through state court in Utah’s 2nd Judicial District; while Loy was listed as Plaintiff on an identical Federal suit. Raland’s state suit got bumped to the U.S. Tenth Circuit on appeal, where it languished undecided since Feb., 2022. Eventually, Raland & his brothers decided to bypass the Tenth Circuit by filing a motion under SCOTUS “Rule #11,” alleging a national emergency. That caught the clerk’s attention, who agreed to bring the case forward.
Word got back to the Tenth Circuit, who r=finally ruled against Brunson’s case; but it was too late anyway - SCOTUS appeared hell-bent on hearing the matter as quickly as possible, with or without the Tenth Circuit’s cooperation, based on accounts shared online by Brunson team podcast interviews. Another unusual development was that the U.S. Attorney’s office delegated representation over to the U.S. Solicitor General, who waived response just before Thanksgiving. Which means that if the Associate Justices nod their okay on Jan. 6th upcoming, the case goes immediately to trial.
The complaint is exquisitely written, containing a two-prong attack; the first civil, alleging a First Amendment violation through the right to “redress of grievances,” and the second a religious argument, claiming that the Ninth Amendment represents a Covenant with God. The brief contains both case law and religious scripture, including excerpts from the Book of Mormon. Essentially the complaint revolves around Congress violating their oath of office, by refusing to proceed with investigations previously voted upon earlier on Jan. 6, 2020, prior to the disruption by so-called protesters, rioters, and/or “insurrectionists.” Since the investigation of the challenged electoral votes was pending on the table, the matter could not be rescinded after the session was restored, as a point of order.
This differs from other court challenges, because it does not directly allege election fraud, but rather seeks redress through enforcement of the constitutional oath, which to date has not been subject to enforcement penalty or “teeth.” A successful outcome of this suit would immediately restore Donald Trump to the Presidency, absent Mike Pence as veep, who receives attainder as a co-defendant in the suit. Plaintiffs urge supporters to write to the Court in favor of hearing their case at: Supreme Court of the United States - Attn: Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr. and All Associate Justices - 1 First Street N.E. Washington, DC 20543. Please also CC your letter to Plaintiffs: Loy & Raland Brunson - 4287 South Harris Blvd. Apt. 132 - Ogden, Utah 84403. A copy of the case can be downloaded at: 7discoveries.com ~or~ mirrored online here at: dailyeagle.news/brunson (requires Acrobat X).
Daily Eagle News
http://dailyeagle.news
Established July 4, 2019
Another frivolous lawsuit to be tossed in the dustbin of history.
I hate to break it to you, but the only place Donnie is going is behind bars.
That must be why SCOTUS put the case on their docket.
Which happens to many doomed cases. Don’t get your hopes up, they haven’t even decided to take the case yet.