Thanks for bringing up the downvote pool. I hadn't thought about that for a while, but I can certain see the benefit of a separate pool.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks for bringing up the downvote pool. I hadn't thought about that for a while, but I can certain see the benefit of a separate pool.
do you think a downvotepool makes sense? I think the way a downvote pool can get abused, has the power to destroy steem.
Think about a voting service with downvotes ( or some big holders play censorship, with stuff they dont like) .
In my opinion 75% currator /25 author is way better.
2 Reasons: Holder need to spend money for steem.
Holder need to read allot of stuff before he find high quality content.
In my opinion it is way more work to find good stuff as to write.
And as a side effect less holders think about "they loss money" if there upvote some stuff.
I have post about some days ago here: https://steemit.com/steemit/@freddio/author-coin-the-solution
And about cat pics,
I think as a social Media platform, people should post about what there like.
For sure it sucks, if a cat pic has 100$ rewards, but i think a Blacklist and remove bought votes should be way better.