The above image was made by @amberjyang with Midjourney using the prompt 'media newspapers crossing out war violence in the headlines.'
The slogan "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" has been chanted by demonstrating activists countless times since October 7. Taken at face value, the slogan suggests replacing Israel with Palestine and implies that millions of Israelis should be, at best, left without a country. This isn't a slogan for peace. The Israelis I know hear it as an existential threat.
Despite this, or perhaps because of it, the slogan continues to be chanted at campus demonstrations across the country. Instead of questioning the inflammatory language, our rabidly anti-Israel independent media is trying to rationalize its use. "Don't Buy the Right-Wing Disinformation Campaign on 'From the River to the Sea'" urges Truthout in a headline before admitting in the story that the slogan originated with Palestinian nationalists in the 1960s. The article's overall message is that we shouldn't take the slogan at face value, but should instead interpret it as a call for Palestinians to have a semi-autonomous democratic homeland under the British Mandate in Palestine.
Independent media's position on the sexual violence carried out by Hamas and related militants on October 7 is even weirder. Many outlets are outright denying that sexual violence was part of the attack. Here's a quote from a Max Blumenthal piece:
Initiated at Israel's United Nations mission in December 2023 with speeches by neoliberal tech oligarch Sheryl Sandberg and former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a recipient of hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations and speaking fees from Israel lobby organizations, Tel Aviv's propaganda blitz has yet to produce a single self-identified victim of sexual assault by Hamas.
Mint Press News went so far as to title an article, "Did Hamas Carry Out Mass Rapes on October 7?" Written by Robert Inlakesh, this piece makes the case that all claims of Hamas' sexual violence are lies being spread by Israel for propaganda purposes. This position actually appears to be the consensus in indi media these days. As Aaron Maté wrote in December: "Actually, only one thing is true: as of now, there are only unsubstantiated claims of sexual violence against Israeli civilians on Oct. 7th, and ample grounds to question them."
Did Maté change his tune as more and more claims of sexual violence were substantiated? Did Inlakesh update his article after Screams Before Silence came out? Did Blumenthal update his position? Not that I've seen.
At this point, more of the horrors of October 7 are coming into focus. Here's a Washington Post piece that gets into it. And here are some findings from a United Nations mission report about it:
Based on the information gathered by the mission team from multiple and independent sources, there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred during the 7 October attacks in multiple locations across Gaza periphery. ... At the Nova music festival and its surroundings, there are reasonable grounds to believe that multiple incidents of sexual violence took place with victims being subjected to rape and/or gang rape and then killed or killed while being raped. ... With respect to hostages, the mission team found clear and convincing information that some have been subjected to various forms of conflict-related sexual violence including rape and sexualized torture and sexualized cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and it also has reasonable grounds to believe that such violence may be ongoing.
Indi media appears ready to dismiss all of this as still more Israeli propaganda. They claim to care about the Palestinian people while tacitly supporting Hamas, a group that's always been horrible for the Palestinian people. Some activists even support Hamas explicitly, recasting the terrorists as freedom fighters justifiably battling an evil empire.
All of this has left me feeling disappointed by alt media. The narrative they're pushing is toxic and delusional. It's also wildly popular, particularly with activists. That Israel continues to perpetrate war crimes in Gaza only makes matters worse. Some reason that if Israel is committing war crimes, and Hamas is fighting Israel, then Hamas must not be so bad. But Hamas is that bad.
Read Free Mind Gazette on Substack
Read my novels:
- Small Gods of Time Travel is available as a web book on IPFS and as a 41 piece Tezos NFT collection on Objkt.
- The Paradise Anomaly is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- Psychic Avalanche is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- One Man Embassy is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- Flying Saucer Shenanigans is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- Rainbow Lullaby is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- The Ostermann Method is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- Blue Dragon Mississippi is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
See my NFTs:
- Small Gods of Time Travel is a 41 piece Tezos NFT collection on Objkt that goes with my book by the same name.
- History and the Machine is a 20 piece Tezos NFT collection on Objkt based on my series of oil paintings of interesting people from history.
- Artifacts of Mind Control is a 15 piece Tezos NFT collection on Objkt based on declassified CIA documents from the MKULTRA program.
The media isn’t really doing anything good to help the masses. They make things toxic and that’s why I find it hard to believe the media
I don’t trust them a bit
Makes sense to me.
It’s good that people are waking up to the horrific scope of the military industrial complex and the “money” party that has corrupted both political parties into being warmongers. Yet the more I learn about the world and all of the horrific wars and atrocities being carried out, I am less trusting of any narrative that reduces complex problems to good guys vs. bad guys. And in the fight to appropriately protect the Palestinian people and children of Gaza who are subjected to unspeakable trauma and suffering, we’ve abandoned nuance and balanced media coverage. I see both mainstream and indie media doubling down on their views, however justified or not. This leaves us with radicalism on all sides and not many people willing to bridge our differences so we can begin to actually work together instead of amplify our own echo chambers. The war machine will continue to drum on, because the deep state thrives off of keeping people polarized and divided.
And wow, that video on Twitter of the activist proclaiming Hamas aren’t terrorists is totally concerning. @uncommonsince76 quoted Assange on that Twitter thread:
"Our cables reveal that Israel supported Hamas in its infancy, that Hamas was used as an instrument to divide the Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO] and the Palestinian resistance," -Julian Assange
This is a fascinating perspective that I’ve o heard before but don’t know much about.
I wouldn't be surprised if Israel supported Hamas in some way at some point. And I still don't buy the idea that Israeli intelligence was surprised by October 7. The razing of Gaza in response to the attack was also fishy, because Israel could've taken out Hamas without killing tens of thousands of civilians. Making sense of this madness is hard enough. Distorted media narratives only add to the problem.
The text you shared addresses complex and controversial issues related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, as well as the role of independent media in covering these events.
It's evident that there's a strong polarization of opinions and narratives surrounding these matters, both in traditional media and in independent outlets. The text highlights legitimate concerns about how certain events are reported and interpreted, especially when it comes to sensitive issues like sexual violence and political slogans.
It's important to recognize that debates about the Israel-Palestine conflict are deeply rooted in historical, political, and cultural issues, and there's a wide range of perspectives and opinions on how to address these complex problems. However, it's crucial that any journalistic coverage, whether mainstream or independent, is accurate, fair, and balanced, taking into account the diversity of viewpoints and experiences.
Furthermore, it's essential to distinguish between legitimate criticism of specific governments' policies and actions and discourse that may incite hatred, violence, or discrimination. The text raises valid concerns about the spread of misinformation and implicit support for violent groups, while also highlighting the importance of a critical and cautious approach to consuming information.
Ultimately, the pursuit of truth, justice, and peace in the region requires open, respectful, and constructive dialogue, both in the media and in society at large. It's essential that we continue to question, learn, and engage responsibly with these complex issues, aiming for a fairer and more peaceful future for all involved.