Will The “Dirty 16” Be Convicted of Genocide?

in #someeofficial-5597012 years ago (edited)

By Neenah Payne

The following articles show a growing case against those who implemented the COVID “health” policies:

  1. Will Shocking Discovery End COVID Coup Now?
  2. Congress Demands Info On Fauci’s COVID Funding Role
  3. COVID Premeditated Mass Murder Case Against Big Pharma?
  4. Why Joe Rogan’s Interviews on Mass Psychosis “Broke The Internet”
On June 2, 2020, The British Expose announced: “COVID FRAUD – Big lawsuits to start in next few weeks against WHO, WEF, CDC, PHE and World Leaders for ‘Crimes against Humanity’.

The article added:

“Since early 2020 much of the western world has been subjected to one of the greatest frauds ever committed against humanity, an alleged pandemic of a new coronavirus which authorities have told us develops into a new disease known as Covid-19. You’ve been lied to, and thanks to hundreds of lawyers and medical professionals who have been working together worldwide gathering evidence on the largest crime committed against humanity since World War II, big lawsuits are set to start on three different continents.

Since July 2020, the Corona Investigative Committee in Germany has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts. The committee has been led by Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich [who]said the WHO, WEF, and people like Bill Gates, Dr Fauci, and Professor Neil Ferguson’s real agenda is “population reduction and population control, which is probably going to be achieved through these vaccinations, which already have extremely serious adverse effects. Another part of the agenda is the destruction of the middle class”.

Fuellmich added that you won’t read anything about this in the mainstream media because people like “Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates have invested a lot of money in media companies”.

Originator of COVID Scam

The article pointed out:

“Dr. Fuellmich set up the Corona Investigative Committee through which he has been able to conclude that the alleged Covid-19 pandemic is an agenda that has been planned for at least ten years. 'Event 201 was a dry run, and the WEF has played an important role,' he said. 'The final result they wanted to arrive at was to get everyone vaccinated. But it isn’t even a vaccine. It’s an experimental gene therapy that has never been tested'.

Fuellmich described how in order to get people vaccinated with this experimental gene therapy they first needed the declaration of a public health emergency of international concern as this would be the basis of giving this new drug emergency use approval. Two former WHO employees testified to Fuellmich that pharmaceutical companies urged WHO in January 2020 to declare an international health crisis. This was necessary so their experimental gene therapy – the 'corona vaccine' – could be approved for emergency use.

They managed to declare that emergency thanks to Drosten’s PCR test which enabled them to create the illusion of thousands of cases that they could then use to declare the public health emergency. 'In a few weeks, very big lawsuits are going to start,' said Fuellmich, who has his sights set on German virologist Christian Drosten who designed the PCR test for corona; Lothar Wieler, the director of the German RIVM; and others. He has heard from American friends that 'they are going after Fauci, he may be fired'. 'In two to three weeks, big things are going to happen on three different continents,' stressed Fuellmich who works with some 200 to 300 other lawyers."

Who Launched COVID Global Hysteria? says the theory that “asymptomatic carriers” can spread COVID was created by German virologist Christian Drosten. That theory was used to justify lockdowns, masks, social distancing, PCR tests, contact tracing, etc. worldwide.

The Science Fraud by Prof. Christian Drosten says:

“Prof. Drosten is the main person responsible for the fact that people all over the world have been, and still are, put under living conditions which are defined as crimes against humanity in the International Criminal Code (ICCPR)…. Prof. Drosten knows that his test…cannot detect an intact, infectious virus.”

In January 2021, Dr. Fuellmich issued a Cease and Desist Order to Drosten. British author David Icke discusses this scam in Secret file on Christian Drosten – the German virologist who is responsible for the PCR protocol (video).

First Trial Against Architects of COVID “Health” Policies

Dr. Joseph Mercola’s January 22 article “Will These People Be Charged With Genocide?” was deleted in 48 hours due to political pressure. Dr. Mercola was listed by President Biden as #1 on the 12 people in the list of the “Dirty Dozen” who are accused of spreading “misinformation” about COVID. The article links to the following video.


“Attorney Reiner Fuellmich and his team analyze the discovery of 'deadly hot batches' of quackccines and how they fit into a statistically provable conspiracy by Big Pharma companies working together to run clinical trials on the unwilling population in obvious contravention of the Nuremberg Code.”

The Case Against The Dirty 16

The article says:

"According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power figures in the COVID-19 pandemic and the push to mandate experimental COVID jabs have been accused of several crimes, including crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the U.K.:

In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on December 6 [2021], an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.

The Dirty 16

In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing are:

  1. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID
  2. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance
  3. Bill Gates
  4. Melinda Gates
  5. Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
  6. Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
  7. Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca
  8. Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson
  9. Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO
  10. Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister
  11. Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser
  12. Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
  13. Sajid Javid, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
  14. June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
  15. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation
  16. Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum
The victims, on behalf of whom the complaint was filed, are “the peoples of the United Kingdom.” One of the seven applicants is Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer. At the end of 2020, he expressed deep concerns about the COVID jabs becoming mandatory, as he could find no medical rationale for their use. In 2021, as we all know, mandates were rolled out around the world.

In April 2021, Yeadon went public with concerns that the shots were part of a depopulation agenda. “I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation,” he said in a “Planet Lockdown” interview in April 2021.”

The article adds:

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal located in The Hague, Netherlands. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S. The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community, such as claims of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression...

As noted in the complaint: “We have tried to raise this case through the local English police and the English Court system without success…. The statute for the ICC declares that ‘The ICC is intended to complement, not to replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution (Article 17(1)(a)). This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly.” Still, the ICC relies on the states’ national law enforcement to arrest individuals, so a member state can still restrict the court’s ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC does not have its own police force to carry out warrants or arrests.

According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute.

Violation 1 — The Nuremberg Code: The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects. Foremost among these codes of ethics is the necessity of informed consent to participate in medical experimentation.

Violation 2 — Genocide

Violation 3 — Crimes Against Humanity: Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers: Murder, Extermination, Imprisonment or severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law, Torture, Enforced sterilizations, Persecution of any identifiable group, Apartheid and other inhumane acts.

Violation 4 — War Crimes are covered in Article 8 of the Rome Statute. The complaint argues that “a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy ‘vaccines.”

They also include a charge of Mens Rea, meaning the intent to commit a crime, stating that: “... the members of the UK government and world international leaders against which we have brought this complaint, are knowingly working on behalf of this global agenda for depopulation through the biological weapons known as SARS-Cov-2 and the m-RNA ‘vaccines.’ We submit therefore that the members of the UK government and world leaders against which we have brought this complaint have both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”

War crimes listed in the complaint include:

Willful killing by way of the experimental COVID jabs, the use of lethal doses of midazolam in nursing home patients diagnosed with COVID, and the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in the shots.

Torture by way of forced mask wearing, the use of test swabs containing carcinogenic chemicals, and the release of a manmade bioweapon. Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health — Examples include the forced use of masks, closing of doctors’ offices, COVID jab mandates, use of psychological warfare, use of economic warfare, use of biological warfare, denial of effective medicines, suppression of alternative treatments, use of ventilators despite evidence of harm, and euthanizing elderly COVID patients with midazolam.

Extensive destruction and appropriation of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. Intentionally directing attacks against civilians, including those not taking direct part in any hostilities. Intentionally launching an attack, knowing it will cause loss of life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, and/or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment.

Violation 5 — Crimes of Aggression

The last violation is crimes of aggression against the British population, covered under Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute.

According to the complaint: “This is a global criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several decades. It is now obvious that ‘the plan’ involves the ultrarich and leaders of most nation states, with a few exceptions. It is also clear that powerful think-tanks including WEF [World Economic Forum] in Davos as well as the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI, are at the centre of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; ‘BUILD BACK BETTER,’ used by the President of WHO, the President of USA, as well as the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the UK as well as countless other world leaders.

The goal of this activity is to create a new world order, through the UN ‘s Agenda 2030, by dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled by an un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of the peoples of the Earth.

In addition to this, the aim is to destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market shares to the largest corporations, owned by the Global Elite. The fulfilment of this goal will most likely lead to full enslavement of mankind. This is being done by means of the threat from both a dangerous biological weapon, the virus, the vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and all other measures. All of which constitute not only a breach of National laws, but also a fundamental breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the Treaty of Rome and our Fundamental Human rights.

It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction.”

New Findings Will ‘Dismantle the Entire Vaccine Industry’

In a January 1, 2022 video announcement, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich — a U.S.-German consumer protection trial lawyer and cofounder of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee launched July 10, 2020 — announced the data they now have is “enough to dismantle the entire vaccine industry.”

Fuellmich is heading up the committee’s corona crisis tort case. Initially, the committee focused on exposing the PCR test fraud, but now they have evidence the vaccine makers were using different lot numbers to carry out an experiment within an experiment, unbeknownst to the public. According to Fuellmich, it looks like an experiment to determine the dosage needed to kill and/or maim people. Different lots or batches contain different dosages and even different ingredients.

The article adds:

According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, they have “hard evidence” of this. He points to an investigation published in late 2021 showing only 5% of the lots were responsible for 100% of the rapid deaths.

Dr. Fuellmich pointed out in 2021: “Everyone who is a part of this – including the doctors who do the pricks, the people who run the place, the people who profit from this, and the governments who encourage people to get vaccinated – is responsible. These are crimes against humanity. I think we need an international coroner’s court. This is worse than what happened in the Third Reich. We have to do something, because the people responsible for this know no empathy and are extremely dangerous. They only care about money and power.”

Dr. Fuellmich promised “We will get them!”.

Defeat The Mandates: An American Homecoming

About 50,000 Americans met in the nation’s capital on January 23 to stop the COVID mandates.

See: Defeat The Mandates: An American Homecoming

Neenah Payne writes for Activist Post and Natural Blaze

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.


I'll be very surprised if any of the courts they've filed in take this up. As near as I can tell, all the stuff in the ICC complaint has already been examined by several courts that found no cause to proceed. I couldn't find any links to the assumed filing in other courts on two continents. I'm pretty sure that filing a complaint doesn't guarantee a court date,

The ICC has taken a little flak in recent years over prosecuting mostly cases against black warlords, so who knows? Maybe they'll take this just to counter that narrative, but I'm pretty sure they would just dismiss all of these charges.

Unless of course Dr. Fuellmich has some evidence to back up all the things he says he believes. That would be great to see, but I'm not getting my hopes up. Much of what he says is just leading and loaded with trigger words, and reads (to me) like a publicity stunt.

Reiner Fuellmich has carefully documented on video almost the entirety of his investigation. A quick search on Odysee will provide you dozens of videos of his interrogations and reveal the testimony and data he has amassed. If you doubt any of his claims, and I do not, because I have seen much of the evidence that supports his charges, you should really have a look.

Regardless of whether the ICC or any courts remain available for us to redress our grievances, not one of Fuellmich's claims are empty or overstated. If anything I would add many names to the list, and charges to the levy. If we have no just courts left we have recourse to, we have always the final remedy at law, which the will of the people effected by their own hands.

Frankly, the courts would surely be more merciful than will we injured by the harms Fuellmich has carefully documented, and that documentation is just as available for our use as it is for just courts.

I'll be surprised if you do inform yourself with the available information. If you were the kind of person to inform yourself before judging, you would have long known of the availability of this information, and would have seen it. If you get your information from your would be masters, you have been disinformed. Fuellmich's investigation is a completely sufficient cure for that problem. You might recall Mark Twain's comment regarding information, to the effect that if you read the papers you're misinformed, but it you don't you're uninformed.

If you want to be informed, look at what Reiner Fuellmich has published on Odysee.

That's on you. Here's the latest I could find:


What I have seen (and that poorly translated 5 hour video was no different) is that he has some proof that very few people suffered adverse reactions, up to and including death, after receiving the vaccine. What he does not have is proof that those adverse reactions were an intentional result of the vaccine. He has proof that a bad batch of vaccines led to an abnormally high number of adverse reactions. He does not have proof that the batch of vaccines was intentionally tampered with. His belief that the distribution of different levels of vaccine components was to test the mortality threshold of the vaccine is not proof: dosage experimentation is part of the testing process for every new medication.

Let's be clear, I'm not saying that any part of this pandemic was handled well, or that all the handling was above-board. I'm saying that all of his evidence (or any of the substantiated evidence I've seen) only proves a standard level of incompetence, it doesn't come anywhere NEAR proving a depopulation agenda. HIS OWN NUMBERS do not support (in my opinion) such an agenda. If the early mortality rate of people who've received the vaccine gets over 15%, he might have a leg to stand on. Since there is no evidence yet that early mortality rate among the vaccinated is on an upward trend, I think it's unlikely to happen.

I did watch many of the videos, before your suggestion. If you had bothered to comprehend my initial comment, or look at any one of my posts outside of the d.buzz community, you could have easily surmised that. I don't just watch them, I use the LBRY desktop app and actually host them. I won't watch all of them, because I figure it's a waste of my time. They all just harp on the same evidence that several courts have already said is insufficient, and they are right!. If he presents smoking gun evidence in one, I'm sure people like yourself will make sure that it does not go unnoticed, and I'll give it a look.

If you want to know what REAL tyranny looked like during a pandemic, look back at history. Just 100 years ago, in both the US and the UK, state forces would round up whole communities, force people into isolation, and forcibly give people shots of a 'vaccine' that sometimes had a mortality rate as high as 40%. Here is just one exaple:

I'll leave you with this: You're never going to be 'informed' by taking all your information from just one source (as you've suggested I do here, placing all your 'knowledge' at the feet of Dr. Fullmich), you're only going to be indoctrinated. The counter-narrative that you're adhering so devoutly to is still part of the official narrative. It's rule #1 of being in control... own both sides of the debate. Just because you're on the other side, doesn't mean you aren't being controlled.

I very much appreciate the unexpected courtesy and substance of your reply. I am very happy you undertake to pay some attention to the information. I will point out a slight misunderstanding you have regarding the 'hot lots' of jabs. It is not one bad lot, but several, and split amongst manufacturers.

As you note, were it just one bad batch, that could certainly be a manufacturing problem. It's not.

Here's an article that provides specifics which seem to nominally show intent and deliberate harm. I note that folks who are dependent on their support for the jab agenda for the suppression of their inchoate anxiety will find facts that show that agenda is a crime against humanity will find such facts an intolerable threat to their felicity. Your comment I originally replied to indicated to me you were amongst that number, but this one indicates I may have misinterpreted your situation. I do hope I was wrong, and that you remain capable of being right rather than dependent on defending your position at all costs.

While we seem to write rather similarly, I note we seem to come to different conclusions. I think that's fine. I'm happy about it. If you only agree with me on everything you will never teach me anything I don't know, and that would be tragic. You have already taught me things I didn't know, and I am grateful. I hope I return the favor, and you are benefited thereby.


Thank you for that article link, which had everything I'm typically looking for (except links to the studies themselves) in a publication that claims to be news.

The information here wouldn't be enough for a conviction in my opinion, but it should be enough to get warrants. A good angle for them to use (which even the article didn't mention) is how 'conveniently' the bad batches end up in poor communities, even when it presents a significant logistical hurdle to deployment of that batch. It is likely that somebody sorted batches that were outside (or barely within) spec to areas where there would be less blowback from higher than average adverse reactions. If they could find some proof that this happened, they could probably get some state AGs to take up criminal charges. AG James here in NY seems to have a real hard-on for big pharma.

Unfortunately, what I think is most likely to happen is that at best, there will be some civil liability suits, they'll settle out with NDAs, and some of the victim's families will recieve small checks.

I can't thank you enough for your well written reply. So far, everyone I've had these kind of discussions with has muted me. It's normal for reasonable people to see the same things through the same fileters and STILL come to different conclusions. Everybody has to weigh their knowledge against their experience and their desires, to come to their conclusions. Even people who see facts the same way will have different experiences, and desires, and won't necessarily agree on how they react to those facts. The important thing is to remember that we don't have to agree on everything to get along, we just have to agree to respect each other's decisions.

Thank you for your comment! We completely agree - it's a long shot, but at least someone is taking it :-)

I don't begrudge the guy trying, I just think that if he was really sincere he would be striking at the policies that allow this shit to happen, not a bunch of people who've already proven immune to prosecution under the current system. Rules need to be changed to hold people visible and accountable, we've known this for decades. If he manages to get any of his current filings heard, or decides to pursue the laws that protect the powerful (not just from prosecution, but scrutiny), I'll give him more attention. For now, to me, my intuition says this looks like bread and circuses.

But maybe it's just that I'm old enough to be more jaded than most.

I hear ya!!