I agree with the sentiment on this Dave but the issue is the implementation. If Terms of Service are updated to incorporate new rules and guidelines then these new rules must be detectable and enforced, otherwise they are pointless and you will end up with some following the rules (quite possibly to their disadvantage) whilst others continue to exploit the system. Therefore if this passes (which I think it will) then the Terms of Service should not be updated until Splinterlands can detect, enforce and prevent those accounts that breach these rules in the future. I believe this critical aspect should form an integral part of this proposal (bit late now I know but I wanted to mention this).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hey @kaljerico I appreciate your feedback and voicing your thoughts. I realize many people feel that enforcement of the rules is necessary before we can vote or roll this out.
I think step 1 is setting the rules. Once the rules are clear and defined, then I would agree the next step would be to ask "how do we implement?".
Here's a comment I just read right before yours and he lays out why defining the rules is important https://peakd.com/@bronko/re-davemccoy-rypp8p ...
The bottom line is I definitely would like to see this pass so that we as a community determine the standard we expect. From there we can implement, and of course adjust if necessary.
Again thanks for the feedback, I'm glad you let me and the community know your thoughts!