So this is for a 2 year period where one set cycle will happen? What happens after it? A new proposal?
I think 2 years is WAY too long for a set cycle
I would also like to know how the repayment is covered? Is it measured in dec or usd or something else? Eg if most of that 2 years dec is well below peg as we are giving it out and then the short time the dao receives it it is close peg how does that work?
If it is measures in usd then I see that being very bad for the dao. As we would likely give out a lot more dec than we receive back in.
I would like more clarity on that and the expectations around the set cycle
Price would have to be determined as mentioned above for accounting purposes.
As far as 2 year cycles go, that's ultimately up to the DAO. The discussions I've had and comments I've read lead me to believe that the majority of people are not looking for another set of cards any time soon.
The proposal covers a 2 year period of development and includes a core set + miniset + other ongoing and developed revenue streams to return value to the DAO. The DAO would also get co-ownership of the IP.
That's only the spending half. I'm more interested in the details of reconciling on the daos end.
I'm very concerned if we move to a 2 year cycle. I'd love to see a poll to gauge the community if that's what they actually want.
Do we have a rough date for the new set? And if it is for 2 years will some of that time be leading up to the next set? Eg if it's approved in 2 weeks, and the next set isn't for another 6 months, then will the end of the cycle be 6 months short until the next set?
The same accounting applies on both ends.
When the next core set and what that cycle looks like is up to the DAO to decide. I've shared my thoughts, others may feel differently. I don't need things to happen the way I think they need to happen, we just need to do what's in the best interest of the DAO and the more important question than just "what's the cycle" is whether or not the community can absorb or has any desire to buy another card set right now. Just throwing one out doesn't mean it's going to sell. We could put one out every month or two if it worked like that.
We don't have a rough date and is part of the reason for structuring the proposal this way instead of them just making another "give us 1.2b DEC to make another set" type of proposal. Ensuring the company is stable and has time and resources to develop new features and game modes should lead to a better overall product while giving more time to develop the next core set and test out new gameplay mechanics.