why not use the same funds and extend it even longer? 4 years instead of a year and a half offering a slower trickle of new supply. It's already crazy over saturated and needs a slower print.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
why not use the same funds and extend it even longer? 4 years instead of a year and a half offering a slower trickle of new supply. It's already crazy over saturated and needs a slower print.