I'll preface my comment by saying I'm by no means an expert on liquidity, so I had to read this through twice before forming an opinion. Based on my understanding, I think this proposal is a good bet, primarily for 3 reasons:
(1) It creates a more sustainable way of injecting liquidity for SPS into the market. This is essentially a test and, if it's successful, we can add more in the future to supplement or replace current forms of liquidity.
(2) It will increase adoption of SPS on SushiSwap, which gives more exposure for Splinterlands to players on Ethereum.
(3) It provides exposure via marketing. If the bonds sell out, then our expense is $10k, but that also means there were purchases, which is a good thing. If we then think of the $10k as a marketing expense, it seems rather reasonable.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: