do you see that we developers have the resources to change the gameplay regularly?
the third rule, for example, was supposed to curb bots, the bot developers: yes, that's a great idea. what happened? bots even benefited from it.
how does this prevent the pure extraction of thousands of accounts that have nothing at all, where the system automatically calculates whether there is a difference between earning and rent and then simply activates the corresponding accounts. so they practically run our reward pool like bitcoin mining, only with less power and at our expense... without investment and without significant risk.
how does it prevent bot farmers from simply activating thousands of dead accounts to feed their inferior accounts with wins?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
->1 Don't get me wrong, everything that has been developed is really great, except the gameplay, that is still the same, since the beginning. It is time to shift the development towards gameplay. More development resources towards Battles 2.0 after Land has been released, please.
->2 Try harder! The more one feels like a human while playing, the more difficult it is for the bot developers. A new ruleset should do the job? That is a joke! 😄 Still feel like a bot while playing.
->3 Spellbook for 150$ but already packs included and other cool assets? Then you have your ownership!
->4 see ->3
and because all this is not so, we should continue to watch how we are robbed ? double punishment for us then :(
well i thank you for your opinion and your time.
i actually thought this was an easy choice.
yes for legitimate players/investors
and no for extractors/botfarms 😕
yes for legitimate players/investors
and no for extractors/botfarms 😕
In THAT we agree. 🙂