I'm absolutely against allocating any more SPS for staking rewards. Why should the DAO reward the mere holding of SPS, if on the other hand it wants to be paid for the mini-set in SPS. This makes absolutely zero sense to me.
If you want to reallocate the SPS instead of keeping it in the coffers (which I think is reasonable), then go ahead and push it into ranked rewards. It will still reward staking SPS, maybe even do something for the absolutely oversaturated SPS rental market. It will also demand that you actually play the game to get the SPS, you know, have cards.
There is no reason to reward merely holding SPS with more SPS. If some non-playing investor type will unstake and dump his SPS because passive incomes ends, great, because chances are all the staking rewards ended up on the market anyway.
I can't help but underline once more that there is a proposal passing currently which gives a hefty discount for paying in SPS because the DAO wants SPS. Why on earth give out SPS at the same time to incentivize it not being put on the market?
maybe cause in the whitepaper staking rewards for 65 month was promised and from what I can see the SPS in the wallet aren't enough to keep this promise or you think it is a good idea to break this promise ?
This proposal is about allocating additional SPS to staking rewards. So if anything, this is going against the whitepaper, by prolonging the staking rewards which are set to expire mid of next year by another 6 months, see the table above.
That said, I don't like how whitepapers are used as set in stone, they are an idea and things must be adapted. I'm just against this adaption, because giving more SPS as rewards for non-gameplay activity is a DEFI move and SPL should, and mostly wants to be, a game. So don't waste SPS on paying people rewards for staking. Especially not when simultaneously a mini-set is coming with the main purpose of gaining more SPS.