Hmm, how to vote if I like the slow down but definitely not the distribution of the added tokens. I guess it won't matter anyway how I vote, but these omnibus proposals are not great. I recently heard from someone in the team that we shouldn't think binary, why do we have to decide binary?
I personally think not adding to land is fine, because land has other benefits now and SPS mining on land seems to me like something that should be eliminated over time.
At the same I can't understand why the biggest share goes into staking, which I consider a complete waste of SPS. I would much rather see this allocated to modern and wild.
I also don't think tournaments deserve 20m when so many DAO sponsored tournaments turn into "buy SPS with DEC cheap" because there are not enough people signing up to not make it on the leaderboard.
And if I understand correctly we allocate 1m SPS to reward holding licenses instead of rewarding actually using licenses? What is the point in that?
TL:DR
Reductions yay, but please make multiple proposals for the individual allocations.
The problem with splitting them is that if we pass just the slow down and distribution mechanic, you're going to see ranked rewards and staking rewards fall off an immediate cliff to the point that it'll remove most incentive to stake the token after a few months when they run out. The rewards allocation isn't specifically about any bucket getting more or less, but to aim for the 3 year target without taking anything from any other buckets. This proposal was built to address and balance those issues so that we have a clear gameplan in place for the next 3 years.